Don't you in most cases want hashes anyway to ensure the integrity of
the files?
It's also not actually that resource intensive to calculate the hash of
a file. Definitely negligible to transferring it.
On 26.02.2018 16:45, Goffi wrote:
>
> My problem is that I don't want to always calculate
So, lest this discussion just die. Here is a proposal:
*
Client-A generates message-ID based on HASH(connection_counter,
server_salt). The connection_counter needs to be maintained only for
one connection. The server salt is server generated, anew for each
connection and is
Hi Michal,
thank you for your comments. I will address them inline.
> I'm really tempted to say that the new message routing (in next gen
> XMPP as discussed during summit)
> must require the message stanza to have "id" attribute. I personally
> think that uuid v4 would enough here.
> This, to
Hi Florian,
thanks for chiming in!
On 13.02.2018 17:57, Simon Friedberger wrote:
>> C2. According to Daniel it is not clear which ID should be used when
>> referencing things. In other words if he gets a delivery receipt
>> for an
>> ID the
