Re: [Standards] [xsf/xeps] Defers many old XEPs (#372)

2017-01-18 Thread Sam Whited
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 4:43 AM, Peter Waher wrote: > As you know, some of these have actually been touched on more recently, but > the editorial team chose not to accept the edits, after waiting several > months. You yourself chose not to accept the edits, because you thought it > was too comp

Re: [Standards] [xsf/xeps] Defers many old XEPs (#372)

2017-01-18 Thread Kevin Smith
Hi Peter, > On 18 Jan 2017, at 10:43, Peter Waher wrote: > > Is it possible for me to mail updates to these XEPs to the editor e-mail, as > was possible before? Sending patches by email remains an option, yes. You could probably even get away with sending the entire source file if you can’t

Re: [Standards] [xsf/xeps] Defers many old XEPs (#372)

2017-01-18 Thread Peter Waher
Hello Sam (and others) As you know, some of these have actually been touched on more recently, but the editorial team chose not to accept the edits, after waiting several months. You yourself chose not to accept the edits, because you thought it was too complicated to have changes made in multi