Re: [Standards] XEP-0393 and XEP-0394 naming

93. From: Standards <standards-boun...@xmpp.org> on behalf of Sam Whited <s...@samwhited.com>Sent: 08 March 2018 16:35To: standards@xmpp.orgSubject: Re: [Standards] XEP-0393 and XEP-0394 naming On Thu, Mar 8, 2018, at 10:26, Kozlov Konstantin wrote:> Yes, maybe. It was just an example.In

Re: [Standards] XEP-0393 and XEP-0394 naming

From: Standards on behalf of Sam Whited Sent: 08 March 2018 16:35 To: standards@xmpp.org Subject: Re: [Standards] XEP-0393 and XEP-0394 naming On Thu, Mar 8, 2018, at 10:26, Kozlov Konstantin wrote: > Yes, maybe. It was just an example. Indeed. I'm okay with renaming if others agree tha

Re: [Standards] XEP-0393 and XEP-0394 naming

Hello!8 марта 2018 г. 21:26 пользователь VanitasVitae написал:Also if we'd do that, we'd have "Message Markup" and "Message Markdown"...Yeah, but it will be really funny. Just like "more" and "less" viewers Linux! :-)With my best regardsKonstantin___ Sta

Re: [Standards] XEP-0393 and XEP-0394 naming

On Thu, Mar 8, 2018, at 10:26, Kozlov Konstantin wrote: > Yes, maybe. It was just an example. Indeed. I'm okay with renaming if others agree that "styling" is confusing for some reason, but only if someone comes up with a name that expresses the intent clearer. "Message Markup", or "Lightweight

Re: [Standards] XEP-0393 and XEP-0394 naming

On Donnerstag, 8. März 2018 17:18:02 CET Kozlov Konstantin wrote: > Hello! > > 08.03.2018, 19:03, "Sam Whited" : > On Thu, Mar 8, 2018, at 10:01, Kozlov Konstantin wrote: > > I think "Markup" more suits > for XEP-0393 and "Styling" for XEP-0394.I guess, we should think about > renaming those

Re: [Standards] XEP-0393 and XEP-0394 naming

Also if we'd do that, we'd have "Message Markup" and "Message Markdown"... Am 8. März 2018 17:23:32 MEZ schrieb Sam Whited : >On Thu, Mar 8, 2018, at 10:18, Kozlov Konstantin wrote: >> For example we may rename XEP-0393 to "Markdown" 'cause its syntax >somewhat >> similar to Markdown[1] language.

Re: [Standards] XEP-0393 and XEP-0394 naming

Hello! 08.03.2018, 19:24, "Sam Whited" :On Thu, Mar 8, 2018, at 10:18, Kozlov Konstantin wrote: For example we may rename XEP-0393 to "Markdown" 'cause its syntax somewhat similar to Markdown[1] language.That seems even more confusing than the other suggestion, because we'd be naming it "markdown"

Re: [Standards] XEP-0393 and XEP-0394 naming

Hello! 08.03.2018, 19:20, "Dave Cridland" :On 8 March 2018 at 16:18, Kozlov Konstantin wrote: The XEPs are not so widely implemented for the moment to care much about it.Actually, I think XEP-0393 has several implementations in widelydeployed clients.Yeah, sure. But I think, both

Re: [Standards] XEP-0393 and XEP-0394 naming

On Thu, Mar 8, 2018, at 10:18, Kozlov Konstantin wrote: > For example we may rename XEP-0393 to "Markdown" 'cause its syntax somewhat > similar to Markdown[1] language. That seems even more confusing than the other suggestion, because we'd be naming it "markdown" even though it's not markdown (o

Re: [Standards] XEP-0393 and XEP-0394 naming

On 8 March 2018 at 16:18, Kozlov Konstantin wrote: > The XEPs are not so widely implemented for the moment to care much about it. Actually, I think XEP-0393 has several implementations in widely deployed clients. I was considering suggesting a Last Call at this point. Dave.

Re: [Standards] XEP-0393 and XEP-0394 naming

Hello! 08.03.2018, 19:03, "Sam Whited" :On Thu, Mar 8, 2018, at 10:01, Kozlov Konstantin wrote: I think "Markup" more suits for XEP-0393 and "Styling" for XEP-0394.I guess, we should think about renaming those XEPs to make their names less confusing.I'm not against this (as the author of 0393) if p

Re: [Standards] XEP-0393 and XEP-0394 naming

On Thu, Mar 8, 2018, at 10:01, Kozlov Konstantin wrote: > I think "Markup" more suits > for XEP-0393 and "Styling" for XEP-0394.I guess, we should think about > renaming those XEPs to make their names > less confusing. I'm not against this (as the author of 0393) if people find this confusing, b

[Standards] XEP-0393 and XEP-0394 naming

Hello! Discussing XEP-0393 and XEP-0394 I mixed them up a few times. That's because their names are really confusing. I think "Markup" more suits for XEP-0393 and "Styling" for XEP-0394.I guess, we should think about renaming those XEPs to make their names less confusing. With my best regards,Konst