Re: [Standards] A possible MIX approach: hiding multiple clients

2017-01-06 Thread Kevin Smith
On 6 Jan 2017, at 10:01, Kevin Smith wrote: > >> >> On 6 Jan 2017, at 07:50, Steve Kille wrote: >> >> >> The recent discussion on the difficulty of proxy JIDs has triggered me to >> write up a more radical idea I have had floating around. >> >> For the most part, a MIX channel deals with use

Re: [Standards] A possible MIX approach: hiding multiple clients

2017-01-06 Thread Kevin Smith
> On 6 Jan 2017, at 07:50, Steve Kille wrote: > > > The recent discussion on the difficulty of proxy JIDs has triggered me to > write up a more radical idea I have had floating around. > > For the most part, a MIX channel deals with users (not clients). Messages > are sent out to each user.

[Standards] A possible MIX approach: hiding multiple clients

2017-01-05 Thread Steve Kille
The recent discussion on the difficulty of proxy JIDs has triggered me to write up a more radical idea I have had floating around. For the most part, a MIX channel deals with users (not clients). Messages are sent out to each user. The MIX Proxy (possible new name "MIX Intermediate Server") di