[Standards] Avatars

2011-08-21 Thread Jehan Pagès
Hi, I am looking more closely to avatars. Right now, we have 4 specifications (more?) that can carry avatars: - XEP-0008: obsolete; - XEP-0054/XEP-0153: vcard-based (vcard-temp), historic; - XEP-0084: PEP-based; draft; - XEP-0292: vcard4-based, and a part PEP. Ok so I won't speak about XEP-0008.

Re: [Standards] Avatars

2011-08-21 Thread Kevin Smith
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 6:20 PM, Florian Zeitz florian.ze...@gmx.de wrote: I think we might need a PubSub profile that allows more configurability in terms of who may see what data (this is quite interesting in terms of most social networking related work too). That's XEP--0060, isn't it? I

Re: [Standards] Avatars

2011-08-21 Thread Kim Alvefur
On Sun, 2011-08-21 at 19:20 +0200, Florian Zeitz wrote: Personally I'd like to see us moving from XEP-0054/XEP-0153 to a XEP-0292/XEP-0084 combination, where the former is just vCard and the later avatar. +1 BTW I'm among those that would prefer using just PEP for vCard4. Having one node for

Re: [Standards] Avatars

2011-08-21 Thread Florian Zeitz
On 21.08.2011 20:15, Kevin Smith wrote: On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 6:20 PM, Florian Zeitz florian.ze...@gmx.de wrote: I think we might need a PubSub profile that allows more configurability in terms of who may see what data (this is quite interesting in terms of most social networking related

Re: [Standards] Avatars

2011-08-21 Thread Jehan Pagès
Hi, On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 4:07 AM, Florian Zeitz florian.ze...@gmx.de wrote: On 21.08.2011 20:15, Kevin Smith wrote: On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 6:20 PM, Florian Zeitz florian.ze...@gmx.de wrote: I think we might need a PubSub profile that allows more configurability in terms of who may see