On 17 Feb 2018, at 16:58, Jonas Wielicki wrote:
>
> On Samstag, 20. Januar 2018 11:24:50 CET Stefan Hamacher wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> Am 19.01.2018 um 22:46 schrieb Peter Saint-Andre:
>>> Did the publication of compliance suites in 2007, 2009, 2010, or 2012
>>> solve any of the issues we hope the 201
On Samstag, 20. Januar 2018 11:24:50 CET Stefan Hamacher wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Am 19.01.2018 um 22:46 schrieb Peter Saint-Andre:
> > Did the publication of compliance suites in 2007, 2009, 2010, or 2012
> > solve any of the issues we hope the 2018 suite will solve? If not, was
> > that because we didn'
On Freitag, 19. Januar 2018 11:31:49 CET Sam Whited wrote:
> If that sounds like you, please reach out and I'd be happy to help you get
> started picking back up where I left off.
I’ll be happy to take over the '18 suites for the sake of getting them
published this week.
I don’t know what the co
> Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 12:13:44 -0600
> From: Sam Whited
> I also hope they make it far easier to navigate the XEPs list. When I talk to
> developers at events and mention XMPP one of the biggest complaints I get is
> "oh, we looked at XMPP but there were multiple things to implement the
> f
Hi!
Am 19.01.2018 um 22:46 schrieb Peter Saint-Andre:
> Did the publication of compliance suites in 2007, 2009, 2010, or 2012
> solve any of the issues we hope the 2018 suite will solve? If not, was
> that because we didn't active tell developers about it?
If I may just drop my 0.2c:
In my opin
On 1/19/18 11:40 AM, Daniel Gultsch wrote:
> 2018-01-19 19:13 GMT+01:00 Sam Whited :
>> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018, at 11:55, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>
>> I also hope they make it far easier to navigate the XEPs list. When I talk
>> to developers at events and mention XMPP one of the biggest complaint
2018-01-19 19:13 GMT+01:00 Sam Whited :
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018, at 11:55, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> I also hope they make it far easier to navigate the XEPs list. When I talk to
> developers at events and mention XMPP one of the biggest complaints I get is
> "oh, we looked at XMPP but there wer
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018, at 11:55, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> I have a meta-level question: of what use are the compliance suites and
> are the benefits worth the costs?
I think they're (probably) worth having just because they encourage clients and
servers to implement the things on the list and do
On 19 Jan 2018, at 17:55, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> I have a meta-level question: of what use are the compliance suites and
> are the benefits worth the costs?
I think the main two benefits could be
1) Give an intended direction of travel
2) Give a guideline on what implementors practically need
I have a meta-level question: of what use are the compliance suites and
are the benefits worth the costs?
Peter
On 1/19/18 10:31 AM, Sam Whited wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As you might know I've been trying to revive the compliance suites that the
> XSF last published (in draft/final form) in 2012.
>
Hi all,
As you might know I've been trying to revive the compliance suites that the XSF
last published (in draft/final form) in 2012.
The compliance suites are lists of features and XEPs that serve three purposes:
- To offer client/server authors a minimal set of XEPs that should be
implement
11 matches
Mail list logo
