Hello Matthew
Thanks for the response, with regards to IBB in the HTTP over XMPP proposal:
>> Hello Matt (again) and Council members.
>>
<> Seems I sent the last mail (below) too quickly, and started to think a
little, with regards to IBB. I have a set of questions/reflections:
>>
>> The IBB r
On May 22, 2013, at 8:50 PM, Peter Waher wrote:
> Hello Matt (again) and Council members.
>
> Seems I sent the last mail (below) too quickly, and started to think a
> little, with regards to IBB. I have a set of questions/reflections:
>
> The IBB requires an open iq-stanza (with response and
: XMPP Standards
Subject: Re: [Standards] Comments on "HTTP over XMPP"
Hello Matt.
Thank you for your input. I'll answer them one at a time:
> I have some comments regarding the Proto-XEP "HTTP over XMPP":
>
> * I don't think the use of is appropriate here, as p
I have some comments regarding the Proto-XEP "HTTP over XMPP":
* I don't think the use of is appropriate here, as per the
guidelines in RFC6120 ยง 8.2.3. At a minimum, the unsafe methods (e.g., DELETE,
POST, PUT, et al) ought to be , although a strong argument can
be made that all ought to be
