Wayne,
Thanks for the feedback, comments below.
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Matthew Miller
linuxw...@outer-planes.net wrote:
On Jan 9, 2012, at 09:06, Wayne Franklin wrote:
The biggest problem with XEP-0289 is that it does not seem to address the
requirement for having the room be able
On Jan 9, 2012, at 09:06, Wayne Franklin wrote:
Matthew,
Sorry to hear that you didn't see the advantages to our approach. We respect
the decision of the council and will provide feedback to XEP-0289. Does this
mean that the other DMUC specs are out of the running?
I personally
At this time, the XSF Council does not accept the Proto-XEP DMUC3
http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/dmuc3.html. It is extremely similar to
XEP-0289 http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0289.html, and the council needs an
explanation of why a new protocol is needed instead of using, and potentially
