Re: [Standards] Experimental XEPs (was: Re: whiteboarding and shared editing)

2007-08-16 Thread Dave Cridland
On Wed Aug 15 21:01:07 2007, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: The XSF is a standards development organization. We're supposed to be developing standards. If people want to publish the results of their experiments on their own websites as input to the XSF's standards development process, they are free to

Re: [Standards] Experimental XEPs (was: Re: whiteboarding and shared editing)

2007-08-15 Thread Boyd Fletcher
In the W3, they publish in the internal working groups multiple versions of specs for a standard that then hash it out. I think we need a similar process. I think we need a more organized approach to developing complex XEPs. On 8/15/07 4:01 PM, "Peter Saint-Andre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

[Standards] Experimental XEPs (was: Re: whiteboarding and shared editing)

2007-08-15 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
Boyd Fletcher wrote: > > On 8/15/07 1:54 PM, "Peter Saint-Andre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Dave Cridland wrote: >>> as an >>> experimental protocol, >> Unlike the IETF, we don't have the concept of an "Experimental" spec. >> The closest we come is Informational specs. More here: >> >> http: