Re: [Standards] Experimental vs. Draft vs. ProtoXEP states

2017-09-06 Thread Paul Schaub
Here is a link to the rendered version: https://geekplace.eu/xeps/xep-jet/xep-jet.html Greetings vv Am 06.09.2017 um 18:46 schrieb Paul Schaub: > > Hello everyone! > > To get back to topic: I made some changes based on your feedback. > Basically my plan is to split JET up into a main XEP and som

Re: [Standards] Experimental vs. Draft vs. ProtoXEP states

2017-09-06 Thread Paul Schaub
Hello everyone! To get back to topic: I made some changes based on your feedback. Basically my plan is to split JET up into a main XEP and some subprotocols. As Daniel suggested, JET will only contain reusable stuff and has no more mentions of OMEMO and OX. Instead I used "stub" encryption method

[Standards] Experimental vs. Draft vs. ProtoXEP states (was: Re: Proposed XMPP Extension: Jingle Encrypted Transports)

2017-09-01 Thread Jonas Wielicki
On Freitag, 1. September 2017 11:19:29 CEST Daniel Gultsch wrote: > What you are describing as incubating can be experimental. But in that case > we need to bump XEPs to draft sooner What about lowering the deferral period to 6 months instead of 12? Would that help to encourage movement to Draft