On 19 Aug 2013 23:15, "Peter Saint-Andre" wrote:
>
> I'm waiting for the IETF discussion to yield clear and stable
> requirements before I start to design any XMPP extensions. :-)
>
Sure, I'm just curious about how much we do already.
By the way, you sound amazingly optimistic that the discussio
Part of why the requirements discussions don't seem to converge is that
remote participation in physical meetings encounters a number of issues,
each of could require a substantial effort to resolve.
However, while this is a "target rich environment", at the most basic
level, the goals were stated
I'm waiting for the IETF discussion to yield clear and stable
requirements before I start to design any XMPP extensions. :-)
On 8/13/13 1:31 AM, Dave Cridland wrote:
> How much of this stuff can we do already? I know that much of (6) has
> been implemented in military clients, and I suspect (2) is
How much of this stuff can we do already? I know that much of (6) has been
implemented in military clients, and I suspect (2) is an application of
Jingle. (7) smells like a BOSH app, or some kind of a bot with a web UI.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Douglas Otis
Date: Tue, Aug 13,
