Re: [Standards] Jingle: what's left?

2007-06-27 Thread Unnikrishnan V
Why not transport descriptions carry the key info than using media band, jingle also is offer answer model. 2 cents :-) thanx unni On 6/26/07, Peter Saint-Andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Unnikrishnan V wrote: > SRTP for media I don't think it's up to us to solve the secure media problem.

Re: [Standards] Jingle: what's left?

2007-06-26 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
Unnikrishnan V wrote: > SRTP for media I don't think it's up to us to solve the secure media problem. There is a lot of ongoing discussion about this topic on the rtpsec mailing list at the IETF (mostly ZRTP vs. DTLS-SRTP). What we need to do is enable the two parties to include the right bits i

Re: [Standards] Jingle: what's left?

2007-06-26 Thread Unnikrishnan V
SRTP for media - modification of UDP transport - reason - current one is not secure , some body with a sniffer can play ur packets. :-) On 6/25/07, Peter Saint-Andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: At ClueCon this week we'll have a roundtable discussion about Jingle: http://www.cluecon.com/schedul

[Standards] Jingle: what's left?

2007-06-25 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
At ClueCon this week we'll have a roundtable discussion about Jingle: http://www.cluecon.com/schedule.html In preparation for that, I plan to review all the Jingle specs. But I'd appreciate it if folks on this list could also point out where they think we still have gaps. Personally I'd like to f