Thanks for the feedback.
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Peter Saint-Andre stpe...@stpeter.imwrote:
On 2/20/13 5:43 PM, XMPP Extensions Editor wrote:
5. Is the specification accurate and clearly written?
I have several questions:
Section 2.1: If a server supports bidirectional
On 6/4/13 11:51 PM, Michal 'vorner' Vaner wrote:
Good morning
I did not write the XEP, not really read it whole, but from common sense:
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 03:41:34PM -0600, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
Section 2.1: If a server supports bidirectional server-to-server
streams, it should
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2/20/13 5:43 PM, XMPP Extensions Editor wrote:
This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments on
XEP-0288 (Bidirectional Server-to-Server Connections).
Abstract: This specification defines a protocol for using
server-to-server
Good morning
I did not write the XEP, not really read it whole, but from common sense:
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 03:41:34PM -0600, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
Section 2.1: If a server supports bidirectional server-to-server
streams, it should inform the connecting entity when returning stream
Am 08.04.2013 18:45, schrieb Philipp Hancke:
Am 19.03.2013 02:49, schrieb Kim Alvefur:
4. Do you have any security concerns related to this specification?
The elevation of any method of domain spoofing to also include possible
interception of outgoing stanzas. Mistakes by, or compromise of a
Patch attached, thanks zash.
hrmpf, wrong patch, even though git should handle that gracefully. This
one is right.
diff --git a/extensions/xep-0288.xml b/extensions/xep-0288.xml
index b94baf1..6d3b2f6 100755
--- a/extensions/xep-0288.xml
+++ b/extensions/xep-0288.xml
@@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ C:
I'm good with that.
On 23 Apr 2013 13:10, Philipp Hancke fi...@goodadvice.pages.de wrote:
Am 08.04.2013 18:45, schrieb Philipp Hancke:
Am 19.03.2013 02:49, schrieb Kim Alvefur:
4. Do you have any security concerns related to this specification?
The elevation of any method of domain
On 2013-02-21 01:43, XMPP Extensions Editor wrote:
1. Is this specification needed to fill gaps in the XMPP protocol stack or to
clarify an existing protocol?
Yes.
2. Does the specification solve the problem stated in the introduction and
requirements?
Yes.
3. Do you plan to implement
This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments on XEP-0288
(Bidirectional Server-to-Server Connections).
Abstract: This specification defines a protocol for using server-to-server
connections in a bidirectional way such that stanzas are sent and received on
the same TCP
