Re: [Standards] MIX, MAM, jidmap, and Jid-Hidden

2017-03-16 Thread Dave Cridland
On 15 March 2017 at 17:46, Kevin Smith wrote: > I’ve not done the research I should have before responding to this, so > apologies if what I say is patently stupid. > >> On 15 Mar 2017, at 14:36, Dave Cridland wrote: >>> On 15 March 2017 at 14:02, Steve

Re: [Standards] MIX, MAM, jidmap, and Jid-Hidden

2017-03-15 Thread Kevin Smith
I’ve not done the research I should have before responding to this, so apologies if what I say is patently stupid. > On 15 Mar 2017, at 14:36, Dave Cridland wrote: >> On 15 March 2017 at 14:02, Steve Kille wrote: >> What you are suggesting here is that

Re: [Standards] MIX, MAM, jidmap, and Jid-Hidden

2017-03-15 Thread Dave Cridland
On 15 March 2017 at 14:02, Steve Kille wrote: > What you are suggesting here is that messages for "JID hidden" and "JID > visible" channels are treated differently, and that you distribute real JIDs > in JID visible channels.This was discussed and I was persuaded that

Re: [Standards] MIX, MAM, jidmap, and Jid-Hidden

2017-03-15 Thread Steve Kille
Dave, > -Original Message- > From: Standards [mailto:standards-boun...@xmpp.org] On Behalf Of Dave > Cridland > Sent: 15 March 2017 10:54 > To: XMPP Standards > Subject: [Standards] MIX, MAM, jidmap, and Jid-Hidden > > Folks, > > [This is long, sorr

[Standards] MIX, MAM, jidmap, and Jid-Hidden

2017-03-15 Thread Dave Cridland
Folks, [This is long, sorry, and has a series of smaller points near the bottom, feel free to skip down] As you may be aware, jid-hidden is a particular driver for our use of MIX. So, too, is historical access to MIX messages, since we're building an asynchronous message board type thing.