On 15 March 2017 at 17:46, Kevin Smith wrote:
> I’ve not done the research I should have before responding to this, so
> apologies if what I say is patently stupid.
>
>> On 15 Mar 2017, at 14:36, Dave Cridland wrote:
>>> On 15 March 2017 at 14:02, Steve
I’ve not done the research I should have before responding to this, so
apologies if what I say is patently stupid.
> On 15 Mar 2017, at 14:36, Dave Cridland wrote:
>> On 15 March 2017 at 14:02, Steve Kille wrote:
>> What you are suggesting here is that
On 15 March 2017 at 14:02, Steve Kille wrote:
> What you are suggesting here is that messages for "JID hidden" and "JID
> visible" channels are treated differently, and that you distribute real JIDs
> in JID visible channels.This was discussed and I was persuaded that
Dave,
> -Original Message-
> From: Standards [mailto:standards-boun...@xmpp.org] On Behalf Of Dave
> Cridland
> Sent: 15 March 2017 10:54
> To: XMPP Standards
> Subject: [Standards] MIX, MAM, jidmap, and Jid-Hidden
>
> Folks,
>
> [This is long, sorr
Folks,
[This is long, sorry, and has a series of smaller points near the
bottom, feel free to skip down]
As you may be aware, jid-hidden is a particular driver for our use of
MIX. So, too, is historical access to MIX messages, since we're
building an asynchronous message board type thing.