Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
Joe Hildebrand wrote:
On Dec 5, 2007, at 12:47 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
Would it be helpful to post a little XEP about this or something?
Perhaps we should just improve Wikipedia starting here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unicode_normalization
and keep
Joe Hildebrand wrote:
On Dec 5, 2007, at 12:47 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
Would it be helpful to post a little XEP about this or something?
Perhaps we should just improve Wikipedia starting here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unicode_normalization
and keep adding more until it
On Dec 5, 2007, at 12:47 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
Would it be helpful to post a little XEP about this or something?
Perhaps we should just improve Wikipedia starting here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unicode_normalization
and keep adding more until it makes sense.
--
Joe Hildebrand
Mickaël Rémond wrote:
Hello,
Le 19 nov. 07 à 23:20, Tomasz Sterna a écrit :
Dnia 19-11-2007, Pn o godzinie 22:27 +0100, Mickaël Rémond pisze:
Nodeprep adds forbidden characters to usual stringprep tables. Among
those characters we find / (47).
IIUC the only reason that slash '/'
Hello,
Le 19 nov. 07 à 23:20, Tomasz Sterna a écrit :
Dnia 19-11-2007, Pn o godzinie 22:27 +0100, Mickaël Rémond pisze:
Nodeprep adds forbidden characters to usual stringprep tables. Among
those characters we find / (47).
IIUC the only reason that slash '/' character is forbidden in a node
On 11/20/07, Tomasz Sterna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dnia 20-11-2007, Wt o godzinie 09:37 +0300, Sergei Golovan pisze:
Some libraries extend it to caracters such as c/o (8453). The
rational
behind that is that it contains a fraction.
I think they do wrong.
You forgot about
Dnia 20-11-2007, Wt o godzinie 09:37 +0300, Sergei Golovan pisze:
Some libraries extend it to caracters such as c/o (8453). The
rational
behind that is that it contains a fraction.
I think they do wrong.
You forgot about Unicode normalization.
So what?
Resource separator is 0x2F
Hello,
I am trying to find the rules (or the logic) behing nodeprep
processing as done by many libraries.
Nodeprep adds forbidden characters to usual stringprep tables. Among
those characters we find / (47).
Some libraries extend it to caracters such as c/o (8453). The rational
behind
Dnia 19-11-2007, Pn o godzinie 22:27 +0100, Mickaël Rémond pisze:
Nodeprep adds forbidden characters to usual stringprep tables. Among
those characters we find / (47).
IIUC the only reason that slash '/' character is forbidden in a node
part is, that it is a resource delimiter.
So encountering
On 11/20/07, Tomasz Sterna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some libraries extend it to caracters such as c/o (8453). The rational
behind that is that it contains a fraction.
I think they do wrong.
You forgot about Unicode normalization.
--
Sergei Golovan
On 11/20/07, Mickaël Rémond [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I end up wondering why this other types of fractions are often accepted by
nodeprep libraries:
1/4: 188
1/2: 189
3/4: 190
Fraction Slash: 8260
Fraction slash normalizes to itself, and all slashes in given
fractions normalize to Fraction
11 matches
Mail list logo