Hi all,
XEP-0053: vCard-Based Avatars [1] is a historical specification that
has been superseded by XEP-0084: User Avatars [2] for quite some time.
However, since it's historical it still shows up in the list on
xmpp.org and this seems like a possible source of confusion to me.
I'd like to propos
Hi,
I'm just giving a +1 for this one.
Regards,
Timothée Jaussoin
On 08/01/2017 15:59, Sam Whited wrote:
Hi all,
XEP-0053: vCard-Based Avatars [1] is a historical specification that
has been superseded by XEP-0084: User Avatars [2] for quite some time.
However, since it's historical it still
On 08/01/2017 14:59, Sam Whited wrote:
Hi all,
XEP-0053: vCard-Based Avatars [1] is a historical specification that
has been superseded by XEP-0084: User Avatars [2] for quite some time.
However, since it's historical it still shows up in the list on
xmpp.org and this seems like a possible sour
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Kevin Smith wrote:
> FWIW, give the remaining widespread deployment of vcard avatars compared to
> pubsub-based, and of reported lack of interop between 84 implementations
> (I'm sure I remember being told that some clients aren't sending mandatory
> formats), it
> On 11 Jan 2017, at 16:44, Sam Whited wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Kevin Smith wrote:
>> FWIW, give the remaining widespread deployment of vcard avatars compared to
>> pubsub-based, and of reported lack of interop between 84 implementations
>> (I'm sure I remember being told th
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 5:44 PM, Sam Whited wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Kevin Smith
> wrote:
> > FWIW, give the remaining widespread deployment of vcard avatars compared
> to
> > pubsub-based, and of reported lack of interop between 84 implementations
> > (I'm sure I remember bein
Wed, 11 Jan 2017 19:56:43 +
Kevin Smith wrote:
> I’m obviously just about the last person to say we shouldn’t be
> trying to modernise XMPP, given mix, bind2, etc., but this just
> doesn’t seem like an area worth much effort as things stand.
What is bind2?
___
On 11 Jan 2017, at 20:09, Evgeny Khramtsov wrote:
>
> Wed, 11 Jan 2017 19:56:43 +
> Kevin Smith wrote:
>
>> I’m obviously just about the last person to say we shouldn’t be
>> trying to modernise XMPP, given mix, bind2, etc., but this just
>> doesn’t seem like an area worth much effort as th
