Re: [Standards] Private Data storage discrepancy

2018-03-17 Thread JC Brand
On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 12:32:57PM +0100, Timothée Jaussoin wrote: > Hi Guus, > > Thanks for the work on Bookmarks :) Indeed that was, I think, a mistake. > On my side I followed the structure of the 0048 > (https://github.com/movim/moxl/blob/master/src/Moxl/Stanza/Bookmark.php#L30) > which, I

Re: [Standards] Private Data storage discrepancy

2018-03-16 Thread Christian Schudt
  Nonetheless it's very confusing, how to properly store and aggregate a list of bookmarks.   -- Christian     Gesendet: Freitag, 16. März 2018 um 12:03 Uhr Von: "Guus der Kinderen" <guus.der.kinde...@gmail.com> An: "XMPP Standards" <Standards@xmpp.org> B

Re: [Standards] Private Data storage discrepancy

2018-03-16 Thread Timothée Jaussoin
Hi Guus, Thanks for the work on Bookmarks :) Indeed that was, I think, a mistake. On my side I followed the structure of the 0048 (https://github.com/movim/moxl/blob/master/src/Moxl/Stanza/Bookmark.php#L30) which, I think is more logical (the storage:bookmarks namespace is defined with this

[Standards] Private Data storage discrepancy

2018-03-16 Thread Guus der Kinderen
Hello, I'm working on migrating Bookmarks ( https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0048.html) from Private XML Storage ( https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0049.html) to PEP ( https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0223.html). I'm was surprised to find a difference between the Pubsub node defined in 0048 example