Am Mi., 31. Juli 2019 um 18:20 Uhr schrieb Ненахов Андрей <
andrew.nenak...@redsolution.ru>:
> The fallback to message reactions is no reactions. If a user is using
> a legacy client, message reactions will likely flood his messenger.
> Fallback *could* be done via quote of a previous message an a
On 15.07.19 17:57, Jonas Schäfer (XSF Editor) wrote:
> The XMPP Extensions Editor has received a proposal for a new XEP.
>
> Title: Message Reactions
> Abstract:
> This specification defines a way for adding reactions to a message.
>
> URL: https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/reactions.html
>
> Th
> HELLO I AM REACTING WITH A THUMBS UP EMOJI PLEASE UPGRADE YOUR MUA SO YOU CAN
> SEE MY REACTION WHICH IS A THUMBS UP EMOJI BY THE WAY DID I MENTION THAT
> THANKS
:frowning_face:
___
Standards mailing list
Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinf
The fallback to message reactions is no reactions. If a user is using
a legacy client, message reactions will likely flood his messenger.
Fallback *could* be done via quote of a previous message an appended
reaction symbol. But it should not be done at all.
ср, 31 июл. 2019 г. в 21:00, Dave Cridla
On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 at 16:43, Kevin Smith wrote:
> On 31 Jul 2019, at 16:40, Jonas Schäfer wrote:
> >
> > On Mittwoch, 24. Juli 2019 22:00:30 CEST Marvin W wrote:
> >>> Backward compatibility
> >>
> >> There clearly have been opposing opinions on that matter. I believe they
> >> are partly drive
Blah, I flipped 367 and 372 a couple of times here. I’m fine with using
Attaching for this and not References - apply that rule whenever I screwed up
the numbers.
/K
> On 31 Jul 2019, at 16:58, Kevin Smith wrote:
>
> On 24 Jul 2019, at 21:00, Marvin W wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> * Jonas Schäfe
On 24 Jul 2019, at 21:00, Marvin W wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> * Jonas Schäfer [2019-07-15 17:59]:
>> Title: Message Reactions
>> This specification defines a way for adding reactions to a message.
>
> Given the feedback this proposed XEP received, I'd like to drop a few
> more comments on the issues
On 31 Jul 2019, at 16:40, Jonas Schäfer wrote:
>
> On Mittwoch, 24. Juli 2019 22:00:30 CEST Marvin W wrote:
>>> Backward compatibility
>>
>> There clearly have been opposing opinions on that matter. I believe they
>> are partly driven by different understanding on how Reactions might be
>> used
On Mittwoch, 24. Juli 2019 22:00:30 CEST Marvin W wrote:
> > Backward compatibility
>
> There clearly have been opposing opinions on that matter. I believe they
> are partly driven by different understanding on how Reactions might be
> used in the wild, but I doubt there will be any way to reach c
Hi,
> * Jonas Schäfer [2019-07-15 17:59]:
> Title: Message Reactions
> This specification defines a way for adding reactions to a message.
Given the feedback this proposed XEP received, I'd like to drop a few
more comments on the issues raised. Sorry, wall of text ahead.
> Referencing messages
>
> We already see, the emojis get less important here and there and are
> replaced by "stickers".
> Which is already supported in XMPP by XEP-0231 (bits of binary, BoB).
> This allows even more childish and silly reactions!
> XMPP reactions should support that.
>
Facetiousness aside, I agree wi
Quoting Dave Cridland :
On Fri, 19 Jul 2019 at 15:52, Georg Lukas wrote:
4. Limitation to Emoji
...
Loose agreement here, but also, I suspect people will rapidly want to react
in custom ways not expressible in Unicode, so we might want URls or inline
media to be possible too.
We already se
What we think of reactions:
- definitely a wanted feature by now
- a client must be capable to fetch all reactions from message archive
when retrieving a message
- there must be a mechanics to pull missed reactions for already retrieved
messages. For example, a client has received a message, wen
On Fri, 19 Jul 2019 at 15:52, Georg Lukas wrote:
> * Jonas Schäfer [2019-07-15 17:59]:
> > Title: Message Reactions
> > This specification defines a way for adding reactions to a message.
>
> This is a long overdue feature. However, I have some principal and some
> practical issues with that.
>
On Freitag, 19. Juli 2019 19:42:22 CEST Marvin W wrote:
> > 2. Backward compatibility
> >
> > This XEP does not provide any way for legacy clients to see reactions.
> > This (silently) precludes a large number of users from a subset of the
> > discussion. I propose(d) the following addition:
>
>
On 19.07.19 19:42, Marvin W wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 19.07.19 16:52, Georg Lukas wrote:
>> This is a long overdue feature. However, I have some principal and some
>> practical issues with that.
>>
>> 1. Referencing messages
>>
>> This is yet another XEP that creates its own encoding for "this message
>
Hi,
On 19.07.19 16:52, Georg Lukas wrote:
> This is a long overdue feature. However, I have some principal and some
> practical issues with that.
>
> 1. Referencing messages
>
> This is yet another XEP that creates its own encoding for "this message
> is related to that message". With MAM and "t
* Jonas Schäfer [2019-07-15 17:59]:
> Title: Message Reactions
> This specification defines a way for adding reactions to a message.
This is a long overdue feature. However, I have some principal and some
practical issues with that.
1. Referencing messages
This is yet another XEP that creates i
The XMPP Extensions Editor has received a proposal for a new XEP.
Title: Message Reactions
Abstract:
This specification defines a way for adding reactions to a message.
URL: https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/reactions.html
The Council will decide in the next two weeks whether to accept this
prop
19 matches
Mail list logo
