On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 7:54 AM, XMPP Extensions Editor edi...@xmpp.org wrote:
The XMPP Extensions Editor has received a proposal for a new XEP.
Title: Remote Authentication
Abstract: This document defines an XMPP protocol extension that enables
entities to use SASL for authentication with
On 12/2/10 7:50 AM, Waqas Hussain wrote:
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 7:54 AM, XMPP Extensions Editor edi...@xmpp.org
wrote:
The XMPP Extensions Editor has received a proposal for a new XEP.
Title: Remote Authentication
Abstract: This document defines an XMPP protocol extension that enables
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 07:58 -0700, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
I wonder: can that model be generalized to other extensions? (Think
pubsub, gateways, etc.)
4. The error condition is 'sasl-required'. Does this imply that
normal MUC password auth should fail, even with a correct password?
What
On 12/2/10 8:12 AM, Kim Alvefur wrote:
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 07:58 -0700, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
I wonder: can that model be generalized to other extensions? (Think
pubsub, gateways, etc.)
4. The error condition is 'sasl-required'. Does this imply that
normal MUC password auth should
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 7:58 PM, Peter Saint-Andre stpe...@stpeter.im wrote:
On 12/2/10 7:50 AM, Waqas Hussain wrote:
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 7:54 AM, XMPP Extensions Editor edi...@xmpp.org
wrote:
The XMPP Extensions Editor has received a proposal for a new XEP.
Title: Remote Authentication
On 12/2/10 8:18 AM, Waqas Hussain wrote:
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 7:58 PM, Peter Saint-Andre stpe...@stpeter.im wrote:
It would also be interesting to use certificate-based authentication.
I've been very interested in certificate-based auth for clients
lately. S2S poses an issue for normal
On Dec 2, 2010, at 8:35 AM, Kurt Zeilenga wrote:
On Dec 1, 2010, at 6:54 PM, XMPP Extensions Editor wrote:
The XMPP Extensions Editor has received a proposal for a new XEP.
Title: Remote Authentication
Abstract: This document defines an XMPP protocol extension that enables
entities to
On Thu Dec 2 15:47:04 2010, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
Another idea: client auto-generates a cert for me and I register it
with
my server when I register an account (or after the first login).
If you're reliant on the server to vouch for your public key (which
is all the certificate is,
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 20:18 +0500, Waqas Hussain wrote:
S2S poses an issue for normal EXTERNAL auth for remote
clients.
Didn't someone mention direct communication with the MUC host over
Jingle? Then XTLS! :D
--
Kim Alvefur z...@zash.se
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 17:06 +, Dave Cridland wrote:
(FWIW, I wondered for some time about clients generating a CSR and
having servers actually be PKIX CAs, but that equally gains nothing,
except adding lots more exciting-looking X.509).
Of course, if the certificate is signed by a
On Thu Dec 2 17:16:06 2010, Kim Alvefur wrote:
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 17:06 +, Dave Cridland wrote:
(FWIW, I wondered for some time about clients generating a CSR and
having servers actually be PKIX CAs, but that equally gains
nothing,
except adding lots more exciting-looking X.509).
The XMPP Extensions Editor has received a proposal for a new XEP.
Title: Remote Authentication
Abstract: This document defines an XMPP protocol extension that enables
entities to use SASL for authentication with remote services (such as
Multi-User Chat rooms).
URL:
12 matches
Mail list logo
