Sounds like you should just do what you need with a private extension, then.
On Oct 4, 2012 6:21 AM, "Andreas Kuckartz" wrote:
> The "why?" is a good question.
>
> And I have a simple answer: It would be the most simple way to implement
> my use case, because I then know that the annotate.js libr
The "why?" is a good question.
And I have a simple answer: It would be the most simple way to implement
my use case, because I then know that the annotate.js library can be
used (https://github.com/szabyg/annotate.js).
annotate.js demos are available here, the second one is updated ever 24
hours:
On 2012-10-03 20:25, Andreas Kuckartz wrote:
A correction. I wrote:
RDFa does not require any additional elements but only support for
these four attributes (the 'a' in RDFa stands for attributes):
vocab, property, resource, typeof
I forgot a few, but that does not change the argument.
Hi A
A correction. I wrote:
> RDFa does not require any additional elements but only support for
> these four attributes (the 'a' in RDFa stands for attributes):
> vocab, property, resource, typeof
I forgot a few, but that does not change the argument.
Cheers,
Andreas
I have had a closer look at the documents.
I think it would be possible to add RDFa support to XEP-0071 by making
a rather small number of modifications which would not break existing
implementations.
RDFa does not require any additional elements but only support for
these four attributes (the 'a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/1/12 1:22 PM, Andreas Kuckartz wrote:
> Does XEP-0071 include support for RDFa ?
>
> (See http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-rdfa/)
>
> If not: Would it be better to extend XEP-0071 or to create a new
> XEP for that purpose ?
As far as I understand it
Does XEP-0071 include support for RDFa ?
(See http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-rdfa/)
If not: Would it be better to extend XEP-0071 or to create a new XEP for
that purpose ?
Cheers,
Andreas
