Re: [Standards] Remarks on XEP-0114

2011-08-16 Thread Jehan Pagès
Hi, On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 1:10 AM, Kevin Smith wrote: > 2011/8/16 Jehan Pagès : >> The use case is a wordpress plugin I wrote which implements XEP-0070. >> Basically the first implementation was with a bot > >> Now I implemented a component alternative (component.shakespeare.lit). > >> Right

Re: [Standards] Remarks on XEP-0114

2011-08-16 Thread Kevin Smith
2011/8/16 Jehan Pagès : > The use case is a wordpress plugin I wrote which implements XEP-0070. > Basically the first implementation was with a bot > Now I implemented a component alternative (component.shakespeare.lit). > Right now, only the bot version is really reliable. Isn't this just sayin

Re: [Standards] Remarks on XEP-0114

2011-08-16 Thread Jehan Pagès
Hi, On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Waqas Hussain wrote: > 2011/8/16 Jehan Pagès : >> Hi, >> >> so I have just implemented something with XEP-0114 (client side) and I >> have a few questions. >> >> (1) In my case, the component was locale. And I imagine that's quite >> the most common case. But

Re: [Standards] Remarks on XEP-0114

2011-08-16 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
On 8/16/11 1:15 AM, Waqas Hussain wrote: > 2011/8/16 Jehan Pagès : >> Hi, >> >> so I have just implemented something with XEP-0114 (client side) and I >> have a few questions. >> >> (1) In my case, the component was locale. And I imagine that's quite >> the most common case. But that's definitely n

Re: [Standards] Remarks on XEP-0114

2011-08-16 Thread Waqas Hussain
2011/8/16 Jehan Pagès : > Hi, > > so I have just implemented something with XEP-0114 (client side) and I > have a few questions. > > (1) In my case, the component was locale. And I imagine that's quite > the most common case. But that's definitely not an obligation > (especially as we could imagine

[Standards] Remarks on XEP-0114

2011-08-15 Thread Jehan Pagès
Hi, so I have just implemented something with XEP-0114 (client side) and I have a few questions. (1) In my case, the component was locale. And I imagine that's quite the most common case. But that's definitely not an obligation (especially as we could imagine "component service providers"). Hence