Re: [Standards] Request for new gateway disco type

2010-02-25 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
On 2/22/10 12:59 PM, Paul Aurich wrote: > Currently, per http://xmpp.org/registrar/disco-categories.html, 'irc' is > not a valid type for a gateway, only for a conference. > > As best as I can tell, this minor distinction would seem to imply that > an IRC component can only proxy MUCs, but not 1:1

[Standards] Request for new gateway disco type

2010-02-22 Thread Paul Aurich
Currently, per http://xmpp.org/registrar/disco-categories.html, 'irc' is not a valid type for a gateway, only for a conference. As best as I can tell, this minor distinction would seem to imply that an IRC component can only proxy MUCs, but not 1:1 chats (except via a room, but that breaks if I, a