Re: [Standards] Requirement Clarification (Re: EXI extension proposal)

2013-03-20 Thread Yusuke DOI
Dear Peter, (2013/03/20 4:41), Peter Waher wrote: - Minimal client requirement How small a client implementation should be? In what way would this affect the XEP? I see this as an implementation detail that can be left to product developers. - Minimal server requirement How small a server

Re: [Standards] Requirement Clarification (Re: EXI extension proposal)

2013-03-19 Thread Peter Waher
Dear Yusuke Thanks for your input. I'll address your comments sequentially: > - Minimal client requirement > How small a client implementation should be? In what way would this affect the XEP? I see this as an implementation detail that can be left to product developers. > - Minimal serve

Re: [Standards] Requirement Clarification (Re: EXI extension proposal)

2013-03-19 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 3/19/13 12:46 AM, Yusuke DOI wrote: > Dear Peter and all, > > (2013/03/18 22:53), Peter Waher wrote: >>> Is a mail with the subject 'Requirement Clarification' sent to >>> the list? >> >> I've not received one. > > Oops, It seems to be sent to di

[Standards] Requirement Clarification (Re: EXI extension proposal)

2013-03-19 Thread Yusuke DOI
Dear Peter and all, (2013/03/18 22:53), Peter Waher wrote: Is a mail with the subject 'Requirement Clarification' sent to the list? I've not received one. Oops, It seems to be sent to different list? Let me re-send one. --- I believe combination of XMPP and EXI should have great synergy

[Standards] Requirement Clarification (Re: EXI extension proposal)

2013-03-15 Thread Yusuke DOI
Dear all, I believe combination of XMPP and EXI should have great synergy and can extend the world of XMPP far more. However, because this space is very wide and I think it's better to clarify requirements on this combination, mainly towards IoT/M2M/sensor network use case of XMPP. Let me st