On 16 Dec 2018, at 09:37, Jonas Schäfer wrote:
>
> This may sound ridiculous at first, given that the text easily fits on less
> than 10 pages in font size, but bear with me.
>
> I was proposing an LC for it to Kevin, because the protocol IMO is rather
> mature, but then I realized that we
On Montag, 17. Dezember 2018 17:24:10 CET Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> +1, although the hash function *recommendations* don't exactly feel
> informational to me.
XEP-0001 states:
> An Informational XEP typically defines best practices for implementation or
> deployment of an existing protocol
On 12/16/18 2:37 AM, Jonas Schäfer wrote:
> This may sound ridiculous at first, given that the text easily fits on less
> than 10 pages in font size, but bear with me.
>
> I was proposing an LC for it to Kevin, because the protocol IMO is rather
> mature, but then I realized that we have a
This may sound ridiculous at first, given that the text easily fits on less
than 10 pages in font size, but bear with me.
I was proposing an LC for it to Kevin, because the protocol IMO is rather
mature, but then I realized that we have a slight issue here:
- The protocol could probably even
