Re: [Standards] XEP-0060, offline modifications and efficient synchronization

2015-09-15 Thread Kevin Smith
On 14 Sep 2015, at 20:22, Matthieu Rakotojaona wrote: > > Excerpts from Kevin Smith's message of 2015-09-14 09:58:56 +0100: >> On 7 Sep 2015, at 23:15, Matthieu Rakotojaona >> wrote: >>> >>> Excerpts from Kim Alvefur's message

Re: [Standards] XEP-0060, offline modifications and efficient synchronization

2015-09-14 Thread Matthieu Rakotojaona
Excerpts from Kevin Smith's message of 2015-09-14 09:58:56 +0100: > On 7 Sep 2015, at 23:15, Matthieu Rakotojaona > wrote: > > > > Excerpts from Kim Alvefur's message of 2015-09-07 14:49:59 +0200: > >> Hi! > >> > >> On 2015-09-05 16:22, Matthieu Rakotojaona

Re: [Standards] XEP-0060, offline modifications and efficient synchronization

2015-09-14 Thread Kevin Smith
On 7 Sep 2015, at 23:15, Matthieu Rakotojaona wrote: > > Excerpts from Kim Alvefur's message of 2015-09-07 14:49:59 +0200: >> Hi! >> >> On 2015-09-05 16:22, Matthieu Rakotojaona wrote: >>> - MAM only allows something like "give me everything since this moment",

Re: [Standards] XEP-0060, offline modifications and efficient synchronization

2015-09-07 Thread Kim Alvefur
Hi! On 2015-09-05 16:22, Matthieu Rakotojaona wrote: > - MAM only allows something like "give me everything since this moment", > however using dates is always problematic (clocks are not > synchronized, time can drift, ...) FYI: MAM lets you request by archive id. There doesn't seem to be

Re: [Standards] XEP-0060, offline modifications and efficient synchronization

2015-09-05 Thread Matthew Wild
On 5 September 2015 at 15:22, Matthieu Rakotojaona wrote: > Hey everyone, > > I'm currently toying with XEP-0060 and have found what I think is a > shortcoming with the spec (or possibly with my knowledge) > > Consider this use case: > > * Patrick is a publisher to

[Standards] XEP-0060, offline modifications and efficient synchronization

2015-09-05 Thread Matthieu Rakotojaona
Hey everyone, I'm currently toying with XEP-0060 and have found what I think is a shortcoming with the spec (or possibly with my knowledge) Consider this use case: * Patrick is a publisher to a given node, Sandra is a subscriber to the same node * Sandra is online * Patrick publishes