Hi Ralph,
I totally agree, I've been thinking about this as well. It's just that I
consider it too unrealistic to have that prominent XEP changed so
significantly. Maybe I'm wrong?
I brought that up because if you're operating in a controlled environment,
client wise you know what you can rely on
On 2015-10-05 10:48, Stefan Strigler wrote:
> Hey there,
>
> when implementing parts of XEP-0060 I came across a maybe inconsistency
> when it's about unsubscribing from a Node (Section 6.2.2
> - http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0060.html#subscriber-unsubscribe).
>
> If we'd allow to also have a th
Hey there,
when implementing parts of XEP-0060 I came across a maybe inconsistency
when it's about unsubscribing from a Node (Section 6.2.2 -
http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0060.html#subscriber-unsubscribe).
If we'd allow to also have a the resulting subscription element in the
response, the impl
