On 18 Apr 2018, at 00:27, Tedd Sterr wrote:
>
> So how would a client choose whether/when to send a mediated invitation or
> direct invitation?
>
> If mediated invitations can't necessarily be trusted, or won't necessarily
> even be received, are they useless?
> Always send a direct invitation
You send a mediated invite if you dont know the real jid, and a direct
if you know
regards
2018-04-18 1:27 GMT+02:00, Tedd Sterr :
> So how would a client choose whether/when to send a mediated invitation or
> direct invitation?
>
> If mediated invitations can't necessarily be trusted, or won't n
So how would a client choose whether/when to send a mediated invitation or
direct invitation?
If mediated invitations can't necessarily be trusted, or won't necessarily even
be received, are they useless?
Always send a direct invitation? Send mediated, wait 10 minutes, then direct if
no reply?
* Tedd Sterr [2018-04-17 01:06]:
> XEP-0249 (Direct MUC Invitations) appears to be aimed at working
> around privacy lists (XEP-0016) blocking, but since privacy lists are
> now deprecated, does it have any other uses cases?
Direct invitations have the benefit that the receiver can verify the
ide
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018, at 18:04, Tedd Sterr wrote:
> XEP-0249 (Direct MUC Invitations) appears to be aimed at working around
> privacy lists (XEP-0016) blocking, but since privacy lists are now
> deprecated, does it have any other uses cases?
I think so; there could still be a server policy in pl
XEP-0249 (Direct MUC Invitations) appears to be aimed at working around privacy
lists (XEP-0016) blocking, but since privacy lists are now deprecated, does it
have any other uses cases?
___
Standards mailing list
Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/l
