Re: [Standards] XEP-352 CSI - server behaviour when client's inactive but sends stanzas

2016-03-31 Thread Dave Cridland
On 31 March 2016 at 17:37, Michal Piotrowski < michal.piotrow...@erlang-solutions.com> wrote: > Thanks for your response. I understand that the extension is about not > sending data from the server to the inactive client. > However it is still possible that a malicious user trying to abuse the csi

Re: [Standards] XEP-352 CSI - server behaviour when client's inactive but sends stanzas

2016-03-31 Thread Michal Piotrowski
Thanks for your response. I understand that the extension is about not sending data from the server to the inactive client. However it is still possible that a malicious user trying to abuse the csi behaviour (a bot rather than mobile client). Maybe I'm too careful here and the server should behave

Re: [Standards] XEP-352 CSI - server behaviour when client's inactive but sends stanzas

2016-03-31 Thread Florian Schmaus
On 31.03.2016 15:26, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > Hi, > > The XEP-352 http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0352.html doesn't say much > about servers behaviour. I'm wondering what should happen when client > goes into inactive state but sends messages after that. > > Should the server respond with an err

[Standards] XEP-352 CSI - server behaviour when client's inactive but sends stanzas

2016-03-31 Thread Michal Piotrowski
Hi, The XEP-352 http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0352.html doesn't say much about servers behaviour. I'm wondering what should happen when client goes into inactive state but sends messages after that. Should the server respond with an error and discard the stanza? Or maybe should the server buffer