On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 5:53 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> Couldn't we do that through a PR against XEP-0045 and review by the
> appropriate parties, such as the author and (given that it's Draft) the
> Council?
That's what happened, it was vetoed, if I recall correctly.
> You might be catching
On 1/2/17 4:47 PM, Sam Whited wrote:
On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Tobias Markmann
wrote:
You created the PR for a reason not? Was the reason invalidated now?
It was something about the XEP-0045 PR recently that sparked it; no
one was clear if the option should be defined in an XEP or just
On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Tobias Markmann
wrote:
> You created the PR for a reason not? Was the reason invalidated now?
It was something about the XEP-0045 PR recently that sparked it; no
one was clear if the option should be defined in an XEP or just added
to the registry, I think. In my
On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 11:24:21AM -0700, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> In the past, we have added things like service discovery identities without
> updating a spec:
Perhaps a good start would be to document the current way of things?
Then, whatever happens, new editors would have something definit
On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 7:24 PM, Peter Saint-Andre
wrote:
> If we get serious about this, we would need to:
>
> 1. Define the different policies we want to use, probably by copying them
> with modifications from RFC 5226 / rfc5226bis.
>
> 2. Update all the relevant XEPs (e.g., XEP-0030) to specify
On 1/2/17 11:05 AM, Tobias Markmann wrote:
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 5:39 PM, Sam Whited mailto:s...@samwhited.com>> wrote:
I recently proposed a change [1] to the way the XMPP registries work to
require that all registries have a ``registration policy" which would
determine how entri
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 5:39 PM, Sam Whited wrote:
> I recently proposed a change [1] to the way the XMPP registries work to
> require that all registries have a ``registration policy" which would
> determine how entries are added to the registry (eg.
> first-come-first-server might mean that any
On 12/29/16 9:39 AM, Sam Whited wrote:
Hi all,
I recently proposed a change [1] to the way the XMPP registries work to
require that all registries have a ``registration policy" which would
determine how entries are added to the registry (eg.
first-come-first-server might mean that anyone could s
Hi all,
I recently proposed a change [1] to the way the XMPP registries work to
require that all registries have a ``registration policy" which would
determine how entries are added to the registry (eg.
first-come-first-server might mean that anyone could simply add an
entry, but spec-required mig
