Re: [Standards] alternate SRV records?

2008-03-24 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
Pedro Melo wrote: Hi, On Mar 21, 2008, at 9:41 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: Some scenarios... [...] 3. Let's say that you want to advertise a c2s or s2s port where TLS is required (e.g., because you have different firewall rules for non-TLS connections). How about this (some different

Re: [Standards] alternate SRV records?

2008-03-24 Thread Alexander Gnauck
Pedro Melo schrieb: XMPP requires TLS. If you don't want to use TLS, you are using Jabber, not XMPP. And then you should look for I don't agree here. You should use TLS whenever possible, but its not required. Many XMPP software for embedded and mobile devices does not support TLS because

[Standards] alternate SRV records?

2008-03-21 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
Some scenarios... 1. Let's say you want to connect to a MUC service. Does it make sense to have an SRV record for that? Such as: _xmpp-groupchat._tcp.conference.jabber.org 5269 athena.jabber.org 2. Let's say you want to connect to a pubsub service that pumps out notifications. How about this?