Re: [Standards] data forms and "x-" parameters

2011-10-18 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
On 9/6/11 7:14 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > On 9/2/11 1:31 PM, Matthew Wild wrote: >> On 31 August 2011 12:19, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >>> >> >>> Given https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-saintandre-xdash/ it seems >>> appropriate for me to lobby for changing the text in XEP-0068. :) >>> >>>

Re: [Standards] data forms and "x-" parameters

2011-09-06 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
On 9/2/11 1:31 PM, Matthew Wild wrote: > On 31 August 2011 12:19, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >> > >> Given https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-saintandre-xdash/ it seems >> appropriate for me to lobby for changing the text in XEP-0068. :) >> >> Does anyone have concerns about modifying the recom

Re: [Standards] data forms and "x-" parameters

2011-09-02 Thread Matthew Wild
On 31 August 2011 12:19, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > > Given https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-saintandre-xdash/ it seems > appropriate for me to lobby for changing the text in XEP-0068. :) > > Does anyone have concerns about modifying the recommendations in > XEP-0068 to align with draft-sai

Re: [Standards] data forms and "x-" parameters

2011-08-31 Thread Matthew A. Miller
On Aug 31, 2011, at 10:19, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > XEP-0068 says: > > ### > > For FORM_TYPEs that are registered with the XMPP Registrar, the field > names MUST conform to one of the following two conditions: > > 1. If the field name is defined by the relevant XEP or by registration, > the

[Standards] data forms and "x-" parameters

2011-08-31 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
XEP-0068 says: ### For FORM_TYPEs that are registered with the XMPP Registrar, the field names MUST conform to one of the following two conditions: 1. If the field name is defined by the relevant XEP or by registration, the field name MUST be registered with the XMPP Registrar and MAY have any n