On 9/6/11 7:14 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> On 9/2/11 1:31 PM, Matthew Wild wrote:
>> On 31 August 2011 12:19, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>>>
>>
>>> Given https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-saintandre-xdash/ it seems
>>> appropriate for me to lobby for changing the text in XEP-0068. :)
>>>
>>>
On 9/2/11 1:31 PM, Matthew Wild wrote:
> On 31 August 2011 12:19, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>>
>
>> Given https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-saintandre-xdash/ it seems
>> appropriate for me to lobby for changing the text in XEP-0068. :)
>>
>> Does anyone have concerns about modifying the recom
On 31 August 2011 12:19, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>
> Given https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-saintandre-xdash/ it seems
> appropriate for me to lobby for changing the text in XEP-0068. :)
>
> Does anyone have concerns about modifying the recommendations in
> XEP-0068 to align with draft-sai
On Aug 31, 2011, at 10:19, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> XEP-0068 says:
>
> ###
>
> For FORM_TYPEs that are registered with the XMPP Registrar, the field
> names MUST conform to one of the following two conditions:
>
> 1. If the field name is defined by the relevant XEP or by registration,
> the
XEP-0068 says:
###
For FORM_TYPEs that are registered with the XMPP Registrar, the field
names MUST conform to one of the following two conditions:
1. If the field name is defined by the relevant XEP or by registration,
the field name MUST be registered with the XMPP Registrar and MAY have
any n