I'm +1 for removing Section 2.4.
After taking a glance through existing implementations I'm aware of, I'm not
seeing that anyone has implemented this feature.
To clarify on-list for future reference, here is why Section 2.4 is problematic:
The Jingle IBB transport is limited in only being
Le 2016-02-24 04:55, Peter Saint-Andre a écrit :
Lance Stout and I had a chat today about Jingle, and he noted that the
multi-session feature in XEP-0261 is not consistent with the rest of
IBB. To make it work properly, we'd need something like components
within a session, but we don't have a way
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 9:55 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> If no one is using this feature currently, I suggest that we remove it from
> XEP-0261.
Agreed; I don't manage an implementation, so their voices should be
heard first, but for the sake of reducing complexity I'd like to see
it removed.
Le mardi 23 février 2016, 20:55:41 Peter Saint-Andre a écrit :
> Lance Stout and I had a chat today about Jingle, and he noted that the
> multi-session feature in XEP-0261 is not consistent with the rest of
> IBB. To make it work properly, we'd need something like components
> within a session, but
Lance Stout and I had a chat today about Jingle, and he noted that the
multi-session feature in XEP-0261 is not consistent with the rest of
IBB. To make it work properly, we'd need something like components
within a session, but we don't have a way to signal that. If no one is
using this featur
