Re: [Standards] standardization process (was: Re: XEP-0353 propose id syntax)

2023-01-06 Thread Florian Schmaus
On 06/01/2023 14.10, Dave Cridland wrote: On Thu, 5 Jan 2023 at 21:38, Florian Schmaus > wrote: On 05/01/2023 16.31, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > On 1/5/23 3:18 AM, Florian Schmaus wrote: > >> I become more and more convinced that we may be better

Re: [Standards] standardization process (was: Re: XEP-0353 propose id syntax)

2023-01-06 Thread Dave Cridland
On Thu, 5 Jan 2023 at 21:38, Florian Schmaus wrote: > On 05/01/2023 16.31, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > > On 1/5/23 3:18 AM, Florian Schmaus wrote: > > > >> I become more and more convinced that we may be better with an IETF > >> I-D / RFC style standardization process. Where an I-D is a mutable, >

Re: [Standards] standardization process (was: Re: XEP-0353 propose id syntax)

2023-01-05 Thread Florian Schmaus
On 05/01/2023 16.31, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: On 1/5/23 3:18 AM, Florian Schmaus wrote: I become more and more convinced that we may be better with an IETF I-D / RFC style standardization process. Where an I-D is a mutable, living document on the road to become an immutable RFC. You know, we

[Standards] standardization process (was: Re: XEP-0353 propose id syntax)

2023-01-05 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
On 1/5/23 3:18 AM, Florian Schmaus wrote: I become more and more convinced that we may be better with an IETF I-D / RFC style standardization process. Where an I-D is a mutable, living document on the road to become an immutable RFC. You know, we could move all of our activities to an IETF Wo