Farid Zaripov wrote:
tests/include/23.list.h
tests/src/23.list.cpp
tests/containers/23.list.iterators.cpp
This test (based on 21.string.iterators test) exercises the following
list class methods: begin, end, rbegin, rend, front, back, get_allocator.
Okay, this looks like a good start! One g
Martin Sebor wrote:
Anton Pevtsov wrote:
[...]
I found the tricky place in the rwthread.cpp, line 397:
void* const next_arg = thr_arg ? thr_arg + i : (void*)(thr_id +
i);
I suspect here should be
void* const next_arg = thr_arg ? *(thr_arg + i) : (void*)(thr_id
+ i);
The fix included.
Martin Sebor wrote:
[...]
I have a semi-exhaustive thread safety test for sting stashed
away somewhere. Let me dig it up and post it to give you an
idea.
The test is attached. It's supposed to be portable across most
today's C++ implementations (which isn't our goal).
The thread safety tests I
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-253?page=all ]
Martin Sebor reassigned STDCXX-253:
---
Assign To: Martin Sebor
> Top level 'make util' command fails
> ---
>
> Key: STDCXX-253
> URL: http://is
Anton Pevtsov wrote:
Martin, I've noted that this commitment brokes several algorithms test
(on MSVC).
They used make_iter in the following way:
const Iterator first = make_iter (xsrc, xsrc, xsrc + nsrc, dummy_it);
And this results in the error:
error C2666: 'make_iter' : 2 overloads have simi
Anton Pevtsov wrote:
Martin Sebor wrote:
Because the virtual function gets called for each character?
Yes. Moreover, the one call of the operator in the test may result in
calls to several virtual functions (one by one).
Hmm, I guess since we're throwing an exception on each call to
the vi
FYI
I'm very satisfied with the overall progress of stdcxx, but see two
obstacles to graduation;
* the bug tracking system is being well utilized to discuss patches,
but the dev list is still a bit quiet on the design-decision front.
It's important that decisions are open and not made in
Top level 'make util' command fails
---
Key: STDCXX-253
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-253
Project: C++ Standard Library
Type: Bug
Components: Build
Environment: All
Reporter: Andrew Black
>From the root o
Great news! Thanks for keeping us in the loop.
Martin Sebor wrote:
Hi,
We have heard that the Tuscany developers have been exploring
the option of using Apache stdcxx as the common implementation
of the C++ Standard Library for Tuscany/C++. We are wondering
whether this is in fact the case and
Hi,
We have heard that the Tuscany developers have been exploring
the option of using Apache stdcxx as the common implementation
of the C++ Standard Library for Tuscany/C++. We are wondering
whether this is in fact the case and, if so, what the stdcxx
team can do in order to make it as smooth as
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-157?page=comments#action_12419595 ]
Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-157:
-
Original Message
Subject: Fw: PMR 02236,K78,000 (Compiler fails to emit symbol for a member
function)
Date: Thu, 6
Farid Zaripov wrote:
But I don't understand why a change in the order of dependencies
makes a difference in the order of libraries on the command line.
Can you explain it to me?
I don't know.
I think it's works because used implicit rule which passes the target
dependenses to the command
> But I don't understand why a change in the order of dependencies
> makes a difference in the order of libraries on the command line.
> Can you explain it to me?
I don't know.
I think it's works because used implicit rule which passes the target
dependenses to the command line
In command
Martin Sebor wrote:
> Because the virtual function gets called for each character?
Yes. Moreover, the one call of the operator in the test may result in
calls to several virtual functions (one by one).
Here is the question: are there any restrictions on the order and number
of the streambuf virtua
Martin, I've noted that this commitment brokes several algorithms test
(on MSVC).
They used make_iter in the following way:
const Iterator first = make_iter (xsrc, xsrc, xsrc + nsrc, dummy_it);
And this results in the error:
error C2666: 'make_iter' : 2 overloads have similar conversions
15 matches
Mail list logo
