Farid Zaripov wrote:
[...]
sleep() can be used instead of nanosleep()?
I think so. The only potential issue is that sleep() may be
implemented using alarm() and calling it might reset a previously
set alarm. But that's probably something we'll have to live with.
ChangeLog:
* process.c
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 12:05 AM
> To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r472469 - in
> /incubator/stdcxx/trunk/tests: include/rw_process.h
> self/0.process.cpp src/process.cpp
>
> This
