RE: openSUSE 10.2 -- gcc 4.1.1/2 -- 22.locale.ctype -- segv

stack trace: #0 0xb7d9dad9 in memchr () from /lib/libc.so.6 #1 0xb7f0012a in __rw::__rw_memattr (addr=0xffa5, nbytes=4294967295, attr=-1) at /home/scottz/stdcxx/src/memattr.cpp:211 #2 0x08069dca in _rw_fmtarray ([EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], array=0xffa5 , nelems=42949

[jira] Commented: (STDCXX-377) [HP aCC +nostl] libc headers not in preprocessor search path

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12485371 ] Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-377: - One important detail I missed is that the problematic declarations in the

openSUSE 10.2 -- gcc 4.1.1/2 -- 22.locale.ctype -- segv

I haven't look too closely at it yet, but it takes a long time for the test to run and it seg faults at the end. NAME STATUS WARN ASSERTS FAILED PERCNTUSER SYS REAL 22.locale.ctype SEGV0 169.650 1.330 188.170 more 22.local

[jira] Created: (STDCXX-377) [HP aCC +nostl] libc headers not in preprocessor search path

[HP aCC +nostl] libc headers not in preprocessor search path Key: STDCXX-377 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-377 Project: C++ Standard Library Issue Type: Bug

Re: [PATCH] dynatype.cpp example and MSVC

Btw., I should mention that I have no objection to immediately committing the first part of this patch, i.e., everything but the #ifdefs and the CREF() macro. That we can deal with later. Martin Martin Sebor wrote: Farid Zaripov wrote: -Original Message- From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMA

Re: problems with new list tests

Farid Zaripov wrote: IBM VAC++/XLC++ results not available or not meaningful HP aCC/IPFall tests die with SIGABRT HP aCC/PA 4 tests fail to compile, one gets SIGBUS SGI MIPSpro OK gcc/Linux OK Sun C++/SPARC 23.list.cons dies with SIGABRT MSVC/Wind

Re: [PATCH] dynatype.cpp example and MSVC

Farid Zaripov wrote: -Original Message- From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 10:35 PM To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] dynatype.cpp example and MSVC This looks familiar. Didn't I already review this patch? [...searching a

RE: [PATCH] dynatype.cpp example and MSVC

> -Original Message- > From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 10:35 PM > To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH] dynatype.cpp example and MSVC > > This looks familiar. Didn't I already review this patch? > > [...searching archive

RE: problems with new list tests

> > > IBM VAC++/XLC++ results not available or not meaningful > > > HP aCC/IPFall tests die with SIGABRT > > > HP aCC/PA 4 tests fail to compile, one gets SIGBUS > > > SGI MIPSpro OK > > > gcc/Linux OK > > > Sun C++/SPARC 23.list.cons dies with SIGABR