[jira] Closed: (STDCXX-469) std::locale::facet ctor and dtor public, should be protected

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-469?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Martin Sebor closed STDCXX-469. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 4.2 Fixed with the referenced change. > std::locale::facet c

Re: Intel C++ build issues on Windows

Greetings Martin According to the IT department, we have version 9.1.037 installed on one build server on each platform. Intel builds on windows are generally broken, due to a poorly coordinated installation of the 10.0.026 compiler. I will be working to resolve these issues on Monday. --Andrew

[jira] Assigned: (STDCXX-469) std::locale::facet ctor and dtor public, should be protected

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-469?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Martin Sebor reassigned STDCXX-469: --- Assignee: Martin Sebor > std::locale::facet ctor and dtor public, should be protected > -

[jira] Created: (STDCXX-469) std::locale::facet ctor and dtor public, should be protected

std::locale::facet ctor and dtor public, should be protected Key: STDCXX-469 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-469 Project: C++ Standard Library Issue Type: Bug

[jira] Created: (STDCXX-468) add sizes of executables to exec's output

add sizes of executables to exec's output - Key: STDCXX-468 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-468 Project: C++ Standard Library Issue Type: New Feature Components: Test Driver

23.deque.special

Below is a part of the 23.deque.special test. These rw_assert's fails because of deque::end() internal representation is dependent on object and cannot be swapped. I think that this part should be replaced to just checking deque.begin() == deque.end() after (and perhaps, before) the swap oper

Re: STDCXX tests fails and reasons [MSVC]

Farid Zaripov wrote: -Original Message- From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 02, 2007 6:51 PM To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: STDCXX tests fails and reasons [MSVC] The test probably assumes that EOF is the same as WEOF which may not be a sa

Re: STDCXX tests fails and reasons [MSVC]

Farid Zaripov wrote: -Original Message- From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Sebor Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 8:17 AM To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: STDCXX tests fails and reasons [MSVC] Is this valid operation (I mean to pass the interna

running RAT on stdcxx (was: Re: [VOTE] ready to graduate)

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Martin Sebor wrote: Btw., does APR use RAT? If so, could you point us at the files and supporting infrastructure you use to set it all up so we could see if we could get it done quickly ourselves? We never have that I know of - but as APR was written from the ground

RE: STDCXX tests fails and reasons [MSVC]

> -Original Message- > From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, July 02, 2007 6:51 PM > To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: STDCXX tests fails and reasons [MSVC] > > >> The test probably assumes that EOF is the same as WEOF > which may not be a safe ass

RE: STDCXX tests fails and reasons [MSVC]

> -Original Message- > From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Sebor > Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 8:17 AM > To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: STDCXX tests fails and reasons [MSVC] > > Is this valid operation (I mean to pass the internal > > bas

RE: [VOTE] ready to graduate

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thu, 05 Jul 2007 15:14:29 -0600 > To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] ready to graduate > > Our mentors as well as a number of IPMC members recently expressed > confidence in stdcxx being ready to graduate out of the

RE: [VOTE] ready to graduate

> [+] Check here (or use +1) to indicate you agree that stdcxx is > ready to graduate. Farid.