Travis Vitek wrote:
Since we don't have a string perf test that I could find, I wrote up a
quick and dirty one that just made many copies of the same string
repeatedly to exercise the atomic increment/decrement. The results show
a 3% performance penalty when using the newer atomic functions. This
Travis Vitek wrote:
Oh, yeah. that is the other thing that I did Friday. I wrote a testcase
to compare __rw_atomic_add32() against InterlockedIncrement() on Win32.
There is a performance penalty...
I'd be curious to know if the performance penalty is due to the
function call overhead or somethi
Since we don't have a string perf test that I could find, I wrote up a
quick and dirty one that just made many copies of the same string
repeatedly to exercise the atomic increment/decrement. The results show
a 3% performance penalty when using the newer atomic functions. This
test was run with an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Sebor closed STDCXX-234.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed as follows:http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=573113&view=rev
Regression test a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12525261
]
Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-234:
-
Here's a test case and the result of compiling it with gcc:
$ cat t.cpp &
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-543?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Sebor reassigned STDCXX-543:
---
Assignee: Andrew Black
Andrew, I'm assigning this to you. It would be great to implement this
test suite failures due excessively long command lines
--
Key: STDCXX-543
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-543
Project: C++ Standard Library
Issue Type: Bug
Compo
Farid Zaripov wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 8:28 PM
>> To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Windows build failures
>>
>> What is the status of the Windows builds on trunk? There
>> still are a l
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: faridz
Date: Wed Sep 5 08:48:43 2007
New Revision: 572976
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=572976&view=rev
Log:
2007-09-05 Farid Zaripov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* 22.locale.messages.stdcxx-508_542.cpp: New regression test
for STDCXX-508 and STD
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-204?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Sebor closed STDCXX-204.
---
Resolution: Duplicate
Closed as a duplicate of STDCXX-522 which has already been fixed.
> std::fileb
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-526?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Sebor closed STDCXX-526.
---
Resolution: Fixed
The tests have been added, so closing.
Travis, please keep an eye on the results o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-532?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Sebor closed STDCXX-532.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.2
Test committed as follows: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?r
Oh, yeah. that is the other thing that I did Friday. I wrote a testcase
to compare __rw_atomic_add32() against InterlockedIncrement() on Win32.
There is a performance penalty...
C:\Temp>t 2 && t 4 && t 8
-- locked inc atomic_add 2 threads
ms 42664
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 8:28 PM
> To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Windows build failures
>
> What is the status of the Windows builds on trunk? There
> still are a large number of severe failur
I have also arranged for stdcxx-dev archives to be uploaded from
Apache to Nabble Forums. The entire list history is now available
there in addition to the Apache archives and The Mail Archive.
Nabble Forums:
http://www.nabble.com/stdcxx-dev-f26255.html
Apache archives:
http://mail-archi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-531?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Sebor closed STDCXX-531.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Corrected test committed in http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=572993&view=rev.
Close
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-413?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Sebor closed STDCXX-413.
---
Resolution: Fixed
This is fine, thanks. Just confirming that the enhanced test actually exercises
th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Farid Zaripov closed STDCXX-542.
> message catalog assert/crash after opening multiple
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Farid Zaripov resolved STDCXX-542.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.2.1)
4.2
Fixed thus: htt
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12525135
]
Farid Zaripov commented on STDCXX-542:
--
The regression test added: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=572976&view=
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-508?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Farid Zaripov closed STDCXX-508.
The regression test added: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=572976&view=rev
> __rw_catlist vector acce
21 matches
Mail list logo