[jira] Commented: (STDCXX-226) __rw::__rw_new_capacity() uses floating point math

2007-11-19 Thread Farid Zaripov (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12543588 ] Farid Zaripov commented on STDCXX-226: -- We can replace _RWSTD_RATIO_DIVIDER == 1000 to 1024 and then replace

[jira] Updated: (STDCXX-226) __rw::__rw_new_capacity() uses floating point math

2007-11-19 Thread Farid Zaripov (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Farid Zaripov updated STDCXX-226: - Attachment: (was: new_capacity.patch) __rw::__rw_new_capacity() uses floating point math

[jira] Updated: (STDCXX-226) __rw::__rw_new_capacity() uses floating point math

2007-11-19 Thread Farid Zaripov (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Farid Zaripov updated STDCXX-226: - Attachment: new_capacity.patch __rw::__rw_new_capacity() uses floating point math

RE: 21.string.cons.cpp test fails on 64-bit MSVC (8.0 and 9.0)

2007-11-19 Thread Farid Zaripov
-Original Message- From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 7:37 AM To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: 21.string.cons.cpp test fails on 64-bit MSVC (8.0 and 9.0) I'm not sure outlining the function is the most efficient way

Re: 21.string.cons.cpp test fails on 64-bit MSVC (8.0 and 9.0)

2007-11-19 Thread Martin Sebor
Farid Zaripov wrote: -Original Message- From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 7:37 AM To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: 21.string.cons.cpp test fails on 64-bit MSVC (8.0 and 9.0) I'm not sure outlining the function is the most

Re: [PATCH] 22.locale.ctype.is.cpp

2007-11-19 Thread Martin Sebor
Martin Sebor wrote: Seems reasonable. We should also guard the calls to the the wchar_t specializations of the function with _RWSTD_NO_WCHAR_T. On second thought, isn't there a more robust way of fixing this, one that makes it work regardless of the order of the calls to the function? E.g.,

Re: svn commit: r596354 - /incubator/stdcxx/trunk/tests/utilities/20.auto.ptr.cpp

2007-11-19 Thread Martin Sebor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: faridz Date: Mon Nov 19 08:20:27 2007 New Revision: 596354 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=596354view=rev Log: 2007-11-19 Farid Zaripov [EMAIL PROTECTED] * 20.auto.ptr.cpp (test_auto_ptr): Worked around bug in MSVC 7.x. Which one? Details

Re: [RFC] stdcxx release process, second draft

2007-11-19 Thread Travis Vitek
Martin Sebor wrote: I've incorporated everyone's feedback and committed an updated version with a number of enhancements of my own. Among the most important are the new Goals section with suggested frequencies of releases, and the integration of the Version Policy (I plan to delete