[jira] Commented: (STDCXX-240) #define _RWSTD_NO_EXCEPTIONS when exceptions are disabled via command line option

2007-12-06 Thread Travis Vitek (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12549291 ] Travis Vitek commented on STDCXX-240: - The original snippet provided above shows someone trying to build their co

[jira] Commented: (STDCXX-673) [IBM XLC++ 9.0/AIX 5.3] 0.printf fails with assertions

2007-12-06 Thread Martin Sebor (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12549281 ] Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-673: - I forgot to respond to your question in above (https://issues.apache.org/

[jira] Commented: (STDCXX-240) #define _RWSTD_NO_EXCEPTIONS when exceptions are disabled via command line option

2007-12-06 Thread Martin Sebor (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12549274 ] Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-240: - Is it enough to #define only _RWSTD_NO_EXCEPTIONS but none of the other e

[jira] Created: (STDCXX-679) [XLC++ 9.0/AIX] failure to apply template conversion operator

2007-12-06 Thread Travis Vitek (JIRA)
[XLC++ 9.0/AIX] failure to apply template conversion operator - Key: STDCXX-679 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-679 Project: C++ Standard Library Issue Type: Bug

[jira] Created: (STDCXX-678) [XLC++ 9.0/AIX] unsats on class template member function taking function with typedef'd parameters

2007-12-06 Thread Travis Vitek (JIRA)
[XLC++ 9.0/AIX] unsats on class template member function taking function with typedef'd parameters -- Key: STDCXX-678 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX

[jira] Commented: (STDCXX-605) [IBM XLC++] errors compiling dynatype.cpp

2007-12-06 Thread Martin Sebor (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12549268 ] Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-605: - I don't think the patch is appropriate. The comment above the function say

[jira] Commented: (STDCXX-603) [IBM XLC++ 9.0] unsats on std::valarray::apply() in 26.valarray.members.stdcxx-313.cpp

2007-12-06 Thread Martin Sebor (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-603?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12549261 ] Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-603: - Committed thus: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=601935&view=rev We also

[jira] Commented: (STDCXX-673) [IBM XLC++ 9.0/AIX 5.3] 0.printf fails with assertions

2007-12-06 Thread Martin Sebor (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12549256 ] Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-673: - I don't know what else we could use on AIX. Maybe we could ask on one of A

[jira] Commented: (STDCXX-676) [MSVC] 22.locale.time.put test fails

2007-12-06 Thread Martin Sebor (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-676?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12549250 ] Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-676: - Patch committed with a few tweaks for some minor formatting issues (lines

[jira] Commented: (STDCXX-677) [IBM XLC++ 9.0/AIX 5.3] tr1/cstdint limit macros incompatible with system provided C headers

2007-12-06 Thread Martin Sebor (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12549248 ] Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-677: - I agree that we should avoid interfering with the native C library if it

[jira] Commented: (STDCXX-443) [IBM XLC++] should avoid using -qinline or -Q in C++ code

2007-12-06 Thread Martin Sebor (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12549242 ] Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-443: - Thanks for doing the research! Looks like there is a small improvement in

Re: Division of STDCXX into smaller distributions?

2007-12-06 Thread Martin Sebor
Eric Lemings wrote: Would it be a good idea to divide the STDCXX distribution into two separate distributions, one distribution containing the primary source, tools, and examples, and the second distribution containing the test driver and test suite? Would this make the test suite more robust

[jira] Assigned: (STDCXX-676) [MSVC] 22.locale.time.put test fails

2007-12-06 Thread Travis Vitek (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-676?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Travis Vitek reassigned STDCXX-676: --- Assignee: Travis Vitek > [MSVC] 22.locale.time.put test fails > -

[jira] Updated: (STDCXX-443) [IBM XLC++] should avoid using -qinline or -Q in C++ code

2007-12-06 Thread Travis Vitek (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Travis Vitek updated STDCXX-443: Attachment: stdcxx-443.patch Well, I don't really have a preference about leaving or removing this

[jira] Updated: (STDCXX-443) [IBM XLC++] should avoid using -qinline or -Q in C++ code

2007-12-06 Thread Travis Vitek (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Travis Vitek updated STDCXX-443: Patch Info: [Patch Available] > [IBM XLC++] should avoid using -qinline or -Q in C++ code > ---

[jira] Commented: (STDCXX-673) [IBM XLC++ 9.0/AIX 5.3] 0.printf fails with assertions

2007-12-06 Thread Travis Vitek (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12549228 ] Travis Vitek commented on STDCXX-673: - The first four failures seem to happen because madvise() on AIX always ret

RE: [RFC] stdcxx release process, second draft

2007-12-06 Thread Eric Lemings
The scope of this issue is rather large for a minor release...IMHO. Brad. > -Original Message- > From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Sebor > Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 9:59 PM > To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [RFC] stdcxx release pr

Division of STDCXX into smaller distributions?

2007-12-06 Thread Eric Lemings
Would it be a good idea to divide the STDCXX distribution into two separate distributions, one distribution containing the primary source, tools, and examples, and the second distribution containing the test driver and test suite? Would this make the test suite more robust, the test driver more