[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12549291
]
Travis Vitek commented on STDCXX-240:
-
The original snippet provided above shows someone trying to build their co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12549281
]
Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-673:
-
I forgot to respond to your question in above
(https://issues.apache.org/
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12549274
]
Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-240:
-
Is it enough to #define only _RWSTD_NO_EXCEPTIONS but none of the other
e
[XLC++ 9.0/AIX] failure to apply template conversion operator
-
Key: STDCXX-679
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-679
Project: C++ Standard Library
Issue Type: Bug
[XLC++ 9.0/AIX] unsats on class template member function taking function with
typedef'd parameters
--
Key: STDCXX-678
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12549268
]
Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-605:
-
I don't think the patch is appropriate. The comment above the function say
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-603?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12549261
]
Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-603:
-
Committed thus: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=601935&view=rev
We also
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12549256
]
Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-673:
-
I don't know what else we could use on AIX. Maybe we could ask on one of A
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-676?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12549250
]
Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-676:
-
Patch committed with a few tweaks for some minor formatting issues (lines
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12549248
]
Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-677:
-
I agree that we should avoid interfering with the native C library if it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12549242
]
Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-443:
-
Thanks for doing the research! Looks like there is a small improvement in
Eric Lemings wrote:
Would it be a good idea to divide the STDCXX distribution into two
separate distributions, one distribution containing the primary source,
tools, and examples, and the second distribution containing the test
driver and test suite?
Would this make the test suite more robust
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-676?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Travis Vitek reassigned STDCXX-676:
---
Assignee: Travis Vitek
> [MSVC] 22.locale.time.put test fails
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Travis Vitek updated STDCXX-443:
Attachment: stdcxx-443.patch
Well, I don't really have a preference about leaving or removing this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Travis Vitek updated STDCXX-443:
Patch Info: [Patch Available]
> [IBM XLC++] should avoid using -qinline or -Q in C++ code
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12549228
]
Travis Vitek commented on STDCXX-673:
-
The first four failures seem to happen because madvise() on AIX always ret
The scope of this issue is rather large for a minor release...IMHO.
Brad.
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Sebor
> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 9:59 PM
> To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [RFC] stdcxx release pr
Would it be a good idea to divide the STDCXX distribution into two
separate distributions, one distribution containing the primary source,
tools, and examples, and the second distribution containing the test
driver and test suite?
Would this make the test suite more robust, the test driver more
18 matches
Mail list logo