Re: [PATCH] 26.valarray.cassign.cpp

2007-08-08 Thread Martin Sebor
ginal Message- From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Sebor Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 7:06 PM To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] 26.valarray.cassign.cpp Farid Zaripov wrote: The 26.valarray.cassign.cpp test expect that UserClass type provi

Re: [PATCH] 26.valarray.cassign.cpp

2007-07-27 Thread Martin Sebor
Farid Zaripov wrote: -Original Message- From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Sebor Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 7:06 PM To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] 26.valarray.cassign.cpp Farid Zaripov wrote: The 26.valarray.cassign.cpp test

RE: [PATCH] 26.valarray.cassign.cpp

2007-07-27 Thread Farid Zaripov
> -Original Message- > From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Sebor > Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 7:06 PM > To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH] 26.valarray.cassign.cpp > > Farid Zaripov wrote: > > The 26.valar

Re: [PATCH] 26.valarray.cassign.cpp

2007-07-27 Thread Martin Sebor
Farid Zaripov wrote: The 26.valarray.cassign.cpp test expect that UserClass type provides +, -, *, / operations. But these operations are not defined in rw_value.h. HP aCC and Intel C++ compile the code but I did notice some errors from gcc yesterday, and I see Sun C++ has trouble with the co