Re: What are these processes doing?

Ken Teague wrote: > I have two processes running on a Linux box that are consuming quite a > lot of CPU time. Scratch that. After digging around a bit more, I found that these processes were waiting for I/O from other threads... just hanging out, drinking a beer and consuming a lot of (CPU) time.

What are these processes doing?

I have two processes running on a Linux box that are consuming quite a lot of CPU time. I ran strace -p on the main program itself and it shows: futex(0x9fd7ef8, FUTEX_WAIT, 1, NULL The main program also uses java, so I ran strace -p on the java process ID and see: futex(0xb7f88bd8, FUTEX_WAIT,

Re: [PATCH] warning: passing argument 4 of ‘ptrace’ makes integer from pointer without a cast

On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 12:13 -0500, Michal Nowak wrote: > Yet another clean-up patch. Compiling on i386 gave me following > warnings: > > [...] > strace.c: In function ‘handle_stopped_tcbs’: > strace.c:2539: warning: passing argument 4 of ‘ptrace’ makes integer from > pointer without a cast > stra

Re: [PATCH] syscall.c:788: warning: unused variable ‘pid’

Hi Michal. On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 09:28 -0500, Michal Nowak wrote: > On i386 building strace from CVS emits following warning: > > if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -Ilinux/i386 -I./linux/i386 -Ilinux > -I./linux -Wall -g -O2 -MT syscall.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/syscall.Tpo" -c -o > syscall.o sys

Re: [PATCH] mem.h: Format ‘%#08lx’ expects type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 2 was type ‘unsigned int’

On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 06:31 -0500, Michal Nowak wrote: > One little patch to get rid of $(SUBJ) warning, I can see here > on i386 with gcc-4.3.2 from Fedora. Compiled also on an IA-64 > RHEL-5.2 box with gcc-4.1.2-42.el5. It's not in mem.h, it's in mem.c Patch is trivially correct, I don't see a