Re: preparing to 4.5.19 release

2009-10-09 Thread Dmitry V. Levin
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 03:01:56AM +0400, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: > On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 02:48:49PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote: > > > I propose to build release tarballs from clean checked out source, and > > > to set file timestamps right after checkout, e.g. > > > > > > git clone /path/to/str

Re: preparing to 4.5.19 release

2009-10-09 Thread Dmitry V. Levin
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 02:48:49PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote: > > I propose to build release tarballs from clean checked out source, and > > to set file timestamps right after checkout, e.g. > > > > git clone /path/to/strace.git && > > cd strace && > > git-set-file-times && > > autoreconf -i &&

Re: preparing to 4.5.19 release

2009-10-09 Thread Roland McGrath
> I propose to build release tarballs from clean checked out source, and > to set file timestamps right after checkout, e.g. > > git clone /path/to/strace.git && > cd strace && > git-set-file-times && > autoreconf -i && > ./configure --enable-maintainer-mode && > TAR_OPTIONS='--owner=0 --group=0 -

Re: preparing to 4.5.19 release

2009-10-09 Thread Dmitry V. Levin
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 10:49:30AM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote: > > Yes, there are no problem, at least for those who just build strace from > > tarball. But there are people who still list tarball contents before use. > > Maybe it's some kind of a taste, but for me it would be a bit more fair if

Re: preparing to 4.5.19 release

2009-10-09 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Friday 09 October 2009 07:42:19 Frederik Schüler wrote: > thanks fot the patch, with a small fix, the 32bit strace binary on sparc > builds now: > > diff --git a/util.c b/util.c > index c96eb0a..ddb7195 100644 > --- a/util.c > +++ b/util.c > @@ -83,7 +83,9 @@ > # define fpq kernel_fpq > # de

Re: preparing to 4.5.19 release

2009-10-09 Thread Roland McGrath
> Yes, there are no problem, at least for those who just build strace from > tarball. But there are people who still list tarball contents before use. > Maybe it's some kind of a taste, but for me it would be a bit more fair if > each file timestamp in tarball would correspond to the last file cha

Re: preparing to 4.5.19 release

2009-10-09 Thread Frederik Schüler
Hi! thanks fot the patch, with a small fix, the 32bit strace binary on sparc builds now: diff --git a/util.c b/util.c index c96eb0a..ddb7195 100644 --- a/util.c +++ b/util.c @@ -83,7 +83,9 @@ # define fpq kernel_fpq # define fq kernel_fq # define fpu kernel_fpu +# ifdef HAS_ASM_REG_H # inclu