Hi Dimitry,
Thanks for fixing Xtensa. I recompiled head
(de462cf99b2826a564f026cf79b631a1e10dad85) and verified that it works.
-Chris
On 05/06/2013 07:02 PM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 09:49:22PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> i think you do point out though that the value
On Tuesday 07 May 2013 11:58:57 Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 11:42:28AM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> > On 5/7/2013 11:38 AM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 09:30:45AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > >> > On Tuesday 07 May 2013 08:14:46 Chris Metcalf wrote
On Tuesday 07 May 2013 11:14:20 Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 10:50:20AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > The recent commit (2690fadc8b3519029274a7405bac13adc469) shuffled the
> > mips headers around causing it to check the ABI defines before it
> > included
> >
> > the head
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 11:42:28AM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> On 5/7/2013 11:38 AM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> > On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 09:30:45AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> > On Tuesday 07 May 2013 08:14:46 Chris Metcalf wrote:
> >>> > > On 5/6/2013 7:43 PM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
>
On 5/7/2013 11:38 AM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 09:30:45AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> > On Tuesday 07 May 2013 08:14:46 Chris Metcalf wrote:
>>> > > On 5/6/2013 7:43 PM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 03:21:38PM -0700, Chris Zankel wrote:
>
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 09:30:45AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 May 2013 08:14:46 Chris Metcalf wrote:
> > On 5/6/2013 7:43 PM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 03:21:38PM -0700, Chris Zankel wrote:
> > >> The Xtensa architecture also used dedicated syscalls and
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 10:50:20AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> The recent commit (2690fadc8b3519029274a7405bac13adc469) shuffled the
> mips headers around causing it to check the ABI defines before it included
> the header which set those up. Now all mips builds fail with:
> In file i
The recent commit (2690fadc8b3519029274a7405bac13adc469) shuffled the
mips headers around causing it to check the ABI defines before it included
the header which set those up. Now all mips builds fail with:
In file included from count.c:36:0:
defs.h:48:4: error: #error Unsuppor
On Tuesday 07 May 2013 08:14:46 Chris Metcalf wrote:
> On 5/6/2013 7:43 PM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> > On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 03:21:38PM -0700, Chris Zankel wrote:
> >> The Xtensa architecture also used dedicated syscalls and doesn't
> >> need to multiplex ipc and socket subcalls.
> >
> > Applied
On 5/6/2013 7:43 PM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 03:21:38PM -0700, Chris Zankel wrote:
>> The Xtensa architecture also used dedicated syscalls and doesn't
>> need to multiplex ipc and socket subcalls.
> Applied, thanks.
No new architecture will ever use the subcall model, so i
The raw llseek syscall is called _llseek from userland, so fix the
naming of it for metag to allow the stat test to pass.
* linux/metag/syscallent.h: rename llseek syscall to _llseek.
Signed-off-by: James Hogan
---
linux/metag/syscallent.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
The metag architecture also uses dedicated syscalls and doesn't need to
multiplex ipc and socket subcalls.
* linux/syscall.h: Do not define SYS_socket_subcall and SYS_ipc_subcall
for metag.
Signed-off-by: James Hogan
---
linux/syscall.h | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/linu
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 06:02:00AM +0400, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> Other printllval-based syscall decoders are likely to have similar issues
> with their syscallent entries.
Should be fixed now, too.
--
ldv
pgpJzMp7ZITw3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
13 matches
Mail list logo