On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 11:33 PM, Abhishek Tiwari
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 5:54 AM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:14:29PM +0530, Abhishek Tiwari wrote:
>> [...]
>>> Is it fine to group statfs+ statfs64+ fstatfs + fstatfs64 + ustat as
>>> %statfs or it should be (st
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 08:36:45PM +0100, Israel vianney wrote:
[...]
> Please I 've gone through the tests and test folder in the source code
> trying to understand the used format, I also checked on codecov what is
> left to be done as for the testing, then noticed some files with 100% miss
> but
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 04:41:22PM +0530, Rishi Bhatt wrote:
[...]
> diff --git a/sysent.h b/sysent.h
> index f4eaa930..7e95ab3a 100644
> --- a/sysent.h
> +++ b/sysent.h
> @@ -22,5 +22,5 @@ typedef struct sysent {
> #define TRACE_INDIRECT_SUBCALL 02000 /* Syscall is an indirect
> socket/i
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 10:58:35PM +0300, Victor Krapivensky wrote:
> * linux/i386/syscallent.h [383]: Add statx entry.
> * linux/x32/syscallent.h [332]: Likewise.
> * linux/x86_64/syscallent.h [332]: Likewise.
> * pathtrace.c (pathtrace_match): Handle SEN_statx.
> * statx.c: New file.
> * statx.h:
Is there any issue that i have to look in the patch that i have sent?
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 4:41 PM, Rishi Bhatt
wrote:
>
> Patched the changes that you have mentioned.
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 7:45 AM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 12:17:08AM +0530, Rishi Bhatt wrote:
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 10:07:27PM +0530, Abhishek Tiwari wrote:
> From 38ea98c7ba87bc485d8af34fc401f46b05b2c035 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Abhishek Tiwari
> Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 16:55:44 +0530
> Subject: [PATCH v4] Implement -e trace=%statfs option for tracing statfs like
> syscalls.
>
* linux/i386/syscallent.h [383]: Add statx entry.
* linux/x32/syscallent.h [332]: Likewise.
* linux/x86_64/syscallent.h [332]: Likewise.
* pathtrace.c (pathtrace_match): Handle SEN_statx.
* statx.c: New file.
* statx.h: Likewise.
* Makefile.am (strace_SOURCES): Add them.
* tests/.gitignore: Add sta
Hi
On Mar 13, 2017 18:44, "Dmitry V. Levin" wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 06:55:44AM +0100, Israel vianney wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am Vianney Israel a second year undergraduate computer science student
in
> ISICOM University from Cameroon. I am new to open-source and i wish to
> contribute to S
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 08:08:29PM +0300, Victor Krapivensky wrote:
> * linux/i386/syscallent.h [383]: Add statx entry.
> * linux/x32/syscallent.h [332]: Likewise.
> * linux/x86_64/syscallent.h [332]: Likewise.
> * pathtrace.c (pathtrace_match): Handle SEN_statx.
> * statx.c: New file.
> * statx.h:
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 06:35:09PM +0100, Eugene Syromyatnikov wrote:
> Please format function declaration as following:
>
> int
> nsfs_ioctl(struct tcb *tcp, unsigned int code, kernel_ulong_t arg) {
Oops. Opening curly brace should be on the next line, like this:
int
nsfs_ioctl(struct tcb *tcp,
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 08:12:02AM +0700, Nikolay Marchuk wrote:
> Thank you for review. I have rewritten my code, but I still have some
> problems with NS_GET_NSTYPE parsing without additional argument. And new
> tests are not fully tested, because I haven't build kernel yet.
Please send patches
* linux/i386/syscallent.h [383]: Add statx entry.
* linux/x32/syscallent.h [332]: Likewise.
* linux/x86_64/syscallent.h [332]: Likewise.
* pathtrace.c (pathtrace_match): Handle SEN_statx.
* statx.c: New file.
* statx.h: Likewise.
* Makefile.am (strace_SOURCES): Add them.
* tests/.gitignore: Add sta
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 04:27:26AM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> This blank line at the end has caused this "git am" response:
>
> Applying: Implement decoding of statx syscall
> .git/rebase-apply/patch:385: new blank line at EOF.
> +
> fatal: 1 line adds whitespace errors.
> Patch failed at 000
13 matches
Mail list logo
