On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 05:19:03AM +0530, Rishi Bhatt wrote:
> I did not know much about version and all so next time i will take
> everything into consideration.Sorry.
>
> The patch is attached.
Please re-read all comments made earlier and please take them into
consideration. I'm not going to r
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 06:08:01PM +0700, Nikolay Marchuk wrote:
> Test was rewritten, now it is based on example from
> https://lists.gt.net/linux/kernel/2606267.
Please note that if it's code is based on that example, it has to be
reflected in the copyright header.
> New test passed on 4.11-rc
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 8:12 AM, Rohan Rajak wrote:
> Hi Sir,
>
> I am not really understanding whether we are covering majority of strace
> code and kernel as well.
Well, covering the kernel code is not a target of the test suite. Test
suite is aimed to check that strace's behaviour is correct (i
Hi Sir,
I am not really understanding whether we are covering majority of strace
code and kernel as well. Also there is a difference of coverage on codecov site
and on other systems I have tested, how would you suggest to solve that .
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 7:30 AM, Eugene Syromyatnikov
wrote:
