On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 02:12:02AM +0900, Masatake YAMATO wrote:
>> Recently, class %sched and %clock are added. Is it necessary to add
>> regular expression to filter system call?
>
>Interesting feature.
>
>> I use '@' as the prefix of regular expression. I think following regular
>> expressions m
* configure.ac (AC_CHECK_HEADERS): Add linux/nsfs.h.
* defs.h (DECL_IOCTL(nsfs)): New prototype.
* ioctl.c (ioctl_decode): Call nsfs_ioctl for 0xb7 code.
* nsfs.c: New file.
* nsfs.h: Likewise.
* Makefile.am (strace_SOURCES): Add them.
* tests/.gitignore: Add ioctl_nsfs.
* tests/Makefile.am (check_
On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 09:23:04PM +0700, Nikolay Marchuk wrote:
[...]
> +int
> +nsfs_ioctl(struct tcb *tcp, unsigned int code, kernel_ulong_t arg)
> +{
> + uid_t uid;
> + switch (code) {
> + case NS_GET_USERNS:
> + case NS_GET_PARENT:
> + return 1 + RVAL_FD + RVAL_DECOD
On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 07:46:11PM +0300, Dmitry Savelyev wrote:
> * util.c: Implement a new sprinttime_nsec function for printing time_t
> and nanoseconds at once.
* util.c (sprinttime_nsec): New function ...
> * defs.h: Prototype for the above.
* defs.h (sprinttime_nsec): New prototype.
> * s
On Sat, Apr 08, 2017 at 10:16:52PM +0800, JingPiao Chen wrote:
> Recently, class %sched and %clock are added. Is it necessary to add
> regular expression to filter system call?
Indeed. Do we really need %sched and %clock if the same effect can be
achieved using ^sched and ^clock regexps?
--
ld
> Recently, class %sched and %clock are added. Is it necessary to add
> regular expression to filter system call?
Interesting feature.
> I use '@' as the prefix of regular expression. I think following regular
> expressions may be used. @time, @[pg]id, @^wait @xattr, @^dup, @^send,
> @^recv, @^re
