Hi Dmitry,
On 3/30/13 6:44 PM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 10:29:05AM -0700, Chris Zankel wrote:
>> On 03/22/2013 06:12 PM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
>>
>>> In this and other similar places, please collapse blocks of undefined
>>> syscall entries using "[N1 ... N2] = {}" notation
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 10:29:05AM -0700, Chris Zankel wrote:
> On 03/22/2013 06:12 PM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 05:09:23PM -0700, Chris Zankel wrote:
> >> It would be great if you could apply the attached patch to add support
> >> for the Xtensa architecture. Xtensa was a
Hi Denys,
On 03/26/2013 04:25 AM, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> On 03/25/2013 06:29 PM, Chris Zankel wrote:
>> I checked again, but couldn't find a good way to use the regset
>> directly. As a recap, Xtensa is a configurable processor with a
>> variable number of internal registers, and from the registe
On 03/25/2013 06:29 PM, Chris Zankel wrote:
> Hi Dimitry,
>
> On 03/22/2013 06:12 PM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 05:09:23PM -0700, Chris Zankel wrote:
>>> It would be great if you could apply the attached patch to add support
>>> for the Xtensa architecture. Xtensa was added
Hi Dimitry,
On 03/22/2013 06:12 PM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 05:09:23PM -0700, Chris Zankel wrote:
>> It would be great if you could apply the attached patch to add support
>> for the Xtensa architecture. Xtensa was added to the kernel a long time
>> ago, and we have kept l
Hi Dmitry,
Thanks for your quick response.
On 03/22/2013 06:12 PM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
>
> + { MA, 0, printargs, "SYS_2" }, /* 2 */
> + { MA, 0, printargs, "SYS_3" }, /* 3 */
> + { MA, 0, printargs, "SYS_4"
Hi,
It would be great if you could apply the attached patch to add support
for the Xtensa architecture. Xtensa was added to the kernel a long time
ago, and we have kept local patches for strace for a long time, but it
would be easier to support it in the mainline repository.
Thanks,
-Chris
>From
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 05:09:23PM -0700, Chris Zankel wrote:
>
> It would be great if you could apply the attached patch to add support
> for the Xtensa architecture. Xtensa was added to the kernel a long time
> ago, and we have kept local patches for strace for a long time, but it
> would b
