On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 03:51:10PM +0100, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-11-03 at 17:28 +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 02:51:42PM +0100, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2014-11-01 at 04:02 +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Oct 16
On Mon, 2014-11-03 at 17:28 +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 02:51:42PM +0100, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
> > On Sat, 2014-11-01 at 04:02 +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 12:05:43PM +0200, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
> > > > The kernel's heade
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 02:51:42PM +0100, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-11-01 at 04:02 +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 12:05:43PM +0200, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
> > > The kernel's headers are not installed into /usr/include, nor are the
> > > Kbuild
> >
On Sat, 2014-11-01 at 04:02 +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 12:05:43PM +0200, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
> > The kernel's headers are not installed into /usr/include, nor are the Kbuild
> > files. Howerver, if linux/ioctlent.sh doesn't see the Kbuild file, it
> > wrongl
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 12:05:43PM +0200, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
> The kernel's headers are not installed into /usr/include, nor are the Kbuild
> files. Howerver, if linux/ioctlent.sh doesn't see the Kbuild file, it wrongly
> assumes we just have an old tree and happily proceeds, leaving many i
The kernel's headers are not installed into /usr/include, nor are the Kbuild
files. Howerver, if linux/ioctlent.sh doesn't see the Kbuild file, it wrongly
assumes we just have an old tree and happily proceeds, leaving many ioctl
definitions out.
Let's look into the build tree instead. Kernel makes
