On Mar 20, 2017 19:54, "Israel vianney" wrote:
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 2:22 AM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 08:36:45PM +0100, Israel vianney wrote:
> [...]
> > Please I 've gone through the tests and test folder in the source code
> > trying to understand the used format,
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 08:29:46PM +0530, Abhishek Tiwari wrote:
> fixed. Patch attached.
Please look at the rest of the e-mail you have replied to.
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engagi
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 2:22 AM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 08:36:45PM +0100, Israel vianney wrote:
> [...]
> > Please I 've gone through the tests and test folder in the source code
> > trying to understand the used format, I also checked on codecov what is
> > left to be d
>> Below is attached a patch corresonding to -e trace=%statfs option.
>> Please review.
>
> git am patch fails to apply this patch with the following diagnostics:
>
> .git/rebase-apply/patch:778: trailing whitespace.
> 17 statfs
> fatal: 1 line adds whitespace errors.
>
fixed. Patch attached.
>
>
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 05:57:39PM +0530, Abhishek Tiwari wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 3:53 PM, Eugene Syromyatnikov
> wrote:
>
> > So, after some thinking, I have the following scheme in mind:
> >
> > {old,}stat{,64} TRACE_STAT TST
> %stat
>
> > {old,}lstat{,64}
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 3:53 PM, Eugene Syromyatnikov wrote:
> So, after some thinking, I have the following scheme in mind:
>
> {old,}stat{,64} TRACE_STAT TST
%stat
> {old,}lstat{,64}TRACE_LSTAT TLST
%lstat
> {old,new,}fstat{,at}64 TRACE_FSTAT
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 02:49:48PM +0530, Abhishek Tiwari wrote:
> Going with the above description for narrow statfs->
>
> Is naming %statfs = statfs+statfs64 as TRACE_NSTATFS and shorthand as TNS
> fine ?
So, after some thinking, I have the following scheme in mind:
{old,}stat{,64} TR
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 2:09 PM, Eugene Syromyatnikov wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 12:24 AM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:14:29PM +0530, Abhishek Tiwari wrote:
>> [...]
>>> Is it fine to group statfs+ statfs64+ fstatfs + fstatfs64 + ustat as
>>> %statfs or it should b
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 12:24 AM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:14:29PM +0530, Abhishek Tiwari wrote:
> [...]
>> Is it fine to group statfs+ statfs64+ fstatfs + fstatfs64 + ustat as
>> %statfs or it should be (statfs+statfs64 + ustat) and
>> (fstatfs+ftsatfs64) i.e. two diff
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 11:33 PM, Abhishek Tiwari
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 5:54 AM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:14:29PM +0530, Abhishek Tiwari wrote:
>> [...]
>>> Is it fine to group statfs+ statfs64+ fstatfs + fstatfs64 + ustat as
>>> %statfs or it should be (st
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 08:36:45PM +0100, Israel vianney wrote:
[...]
> Please I 've gone through the tests and test folder in the source code
> trying to understand the used format, I also checked on codecov what is
> left to be done as for the testing, then noticed some files with 100% miss
> but
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 10:07:27PM +0530, Abhishek Tiwari wrote:
> From 38ea98c7ba87bc485d8af34fc401f46b05b2c035 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Abhishek Tiwari
> Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 16:55:44 +0530
> Subject: [PATCH v4] Implement -e trace=%statfs option for tracing statfs like
> syscalls.
>
Hi
On Mar 13, 2017 18:44, "Dmitry V. Levin" wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 06:55:44AM +0100, Israel vianney wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am Vianney Israel a second year undergraduate computer science student
in
> ISICOM University from Cameroon. I am new to open-source and i wish to
> contribute to S
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 06:35:09PM +0100, Eugene Syromyatnikov wrote:
> Please format function declaration as following:
>
> int
> nsfs_ioctl(struct tcb *tcp, unsigned int code, kernel_ulong_t arg) {
Oops. Opening curly brace should be on the next line, like this:
int
nsfs_ioctl(struct tcb *tcp,
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 08:12:02AM +0700, Nikolay Marchuk wrote:
> Thank you for review. I have rewritten my code, but I still have some
> problems with NS_GET_NSTYPE parsing without additional argument. And new
> tests are not fully tested, because I haven't build kernel yet.
Please send patches
Thank you for review. I have rewritten my code, but I still have some
problems with NS_GET_NSTYPE parsing without additional argument. And new
tests are not fully tested, because I haven't build kernel yet.
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 9:01 AM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 03:22:3
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 5:54 AM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:14:29PM +0530, Abhishek Tiwari wrote:
> [...]
>> Is it fine to group statfs+ statfs64+ fstatfs + fstatfs64 + ustat as
>> %statfs or it should be (statfs+statfs64 + ustat) and
>> (fstatfs+ftsatfs64) i.e. two diffe
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Abhishek Tiwari
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:14 PM, Abhishek Tiwari
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 8:44 AM, Abhishek Tiwari
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 2:00 AM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 12:40:46AM +0530, Abhishek
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:14 PM, Abhishek Tiwari
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 8:44 AM, Abhishek Tiwari
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 2:00 AM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 12:40:46AM +0530, Abhishek Tiwari wrote:
> Per-file summary is not in GNU change log fo
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 03:22:36PM +0700, Nikolay Marchuk wrote:
> Hello,
> I have implemented NS_* ioctls. Should I use common ioctlent interface to
> print them with additional argument or should I print them without it?
Why do you think printing additional arguments makes any sense?
> From f03
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:14:29PM +0530, Abhishek Tiwari wrote:
[...]
> Is it fine to group statfs+ statfs64+ fstatfs + fstatfs64 + ustat as
> %statfs or it should be (statfs+statfs64 + ustat) and
> (fstatfs+ftsatfs64) i.e. two different classes ?
Well, I don't have a ready answer to this questi
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 8:44 AM, Abhishek Tiwari
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 2:00 AM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 12:40:46AM +0530, Abhishek Tiwari wrote:
>>> > Per-file summary is not in GNU change log format, please refer to
>>> > https://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/ht
Hello,
I have implemented NS_* ioctls. Should I use common ioctlent interface to
print them with additional argument or should I print them without it?
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 9:21 AM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 08:35:45AM +0700, Николай Марчук wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 2:00 AM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 12:40:46AM +0530, Abhishek Tiwari wrote:
>> > Per-file summary is not in GNU change log format, please refer to
>> > https://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/html_node/Style-of-Change-Logs.html .
>> > Specifically, it lack
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 08:35:45AM +0700, Николай Марчук wrote:
> Hello,
> my name is Nikolay Marchuk and I am a first-year student in NSU, Russia. I
> want to implement advanced filtering syntax for strace. I am familiar with
> c and c++ and have an experience of making parsers.
Thanks for s
Hello,
my name is Nikolay Marchuk and I am a first-year student in NSU, Russia. I
want to implement advanced filtering syntax for strace. I am familiar with
c and c++ and have an experience of making parsers.
I wanted to add support of new ioctl commands from linux 4.9 - 4.11 as my
introduction mic
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 12:40:46AM +0530, Abhishek Tiwari wrote:
> > Per-file summary is not in GNU change log format, please refer to
> > https://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/html_node/Style-of-Change-Logs.html .
> > Specifically, it lacks asterisks at the beginning of each new file
> > description
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 06:55:44AM +0100, Israel vianney wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am Vianney Israel a second year undergraduate computer science student in
> ISICOM University from Cameroon. I am new to open-source and i wish to
> contribute to Strace as for Gsoc 2017.
> I am familiar with C, git a
> Thank you for the patch acceptance.
> Is the following list of open system calls complete ? It is based on
> reply that function calls that returns new file descriptor
>
> 1) mq_open
> 2) openat
> 3) perf_event_open
> 4) open_by_handle_at
> 5) memfd_create
> 6) epoll_create1
> 7) dup
> 8) dup3
>
On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 02:26:42PM +0530, Abhishek Tiwari wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 1:46 PM, Abhishek Tiwari
> wrote:
> > Sir, I figured out that open system call is implemented corresponding
> > to kernel version it supports, so open syscall is inside
> > linux/x32/syscallent.h while opena
Hi,
I am Vianney Israel a second year undergraduate computer science student in
ISICOM University from Cameroon. I am new to open-source and i wish to
contribute to Strace as for Gsoc 2017.
I am familiar with C, git and system/shell programming.
Also, i have cloned and build the strace code base
On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 1:46 PM, Abhishek Tiwari
wrote:
> Sir, I figured out that open system call is implemented corresponding
> to kernel version it supports, so open syscall is inside
> linux/x32/syscallent.h while openat is used in later versions.
> Please verify that the open-like system call
Sir, I figured out that open system call is implemented corresponding
to kernel version it supports, so open syscall is inside
linux/x32/syscallent.h while openat is used in later versions.
Please verify that the open-like system call list is complete.
Implemented -e trace=%stat class and submitti
> Thank you for the patch acceptance.
> Is the following list of open system calls complete ? It is based on
> reply that function calls that returns new file descriptor
>
> 1) mq_open
> 2) openat
> 3) perf_event_open
> 4) open_by_handle_at
> 5) memfd_create
> 6) epoll_create1
> 7) dup
> 8) dup3
>
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 5:39 AM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 07:51:49AM +0530, Abhishek Tiwari wrote:
>> Made changes in description of commit message and INSTALL-git.md.
>> From bfb8f2576e947b8b1abd7709f1ae8277d77e3c2a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Abhishek Tiwari
>> Date
On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 07:51:49AM +0530, Abhishek Tiwari wrote:
> Made changes in description of commit message and INSTALL-git.md.
> From bfb8f2576e947b8b1abd7709f1ae8277d77e3c2a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Abhishek Tiwari
> Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 08:49:30 +0530
> Subject: [PATCH v6] Updated
> What unix system calls are to be grouped as open-like system calls?
I'd assume that open-like system call is a system call which returns
new fd, but others' interpretations may vary.
> and I can't find open system call inside linux/32/syscallent.h ?
open(path, flags, mode) can be implemented as
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 3:01 AM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 08:35:07PM +0530, Abhishek Tiwari wrote:
> [...]
>> Updated patch file is attached. Please review.
>> From 79cfa5613d90c87e0b29ada3a7075eb0660d19b8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Abhishek Tiwari
>> Date: Mon, 6 M
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 08:35:07PM +0530, Abhishek Tiwari wrote:
[...]
> Updated patch file is attached. Please review.
> From 79cfa5613d90c87e0b29ada3a7075eb0660d19b8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Abhishek Tiwari
> Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 20:21:23 +0530
> Subject: [PATCH v5] Updated information
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 02:40:48PM +0530, Abhishek Tiwari wrote:
> [...]
>> Corrected format of the commit message and performed rebase. Please
>> review the attached patch
>
>> From 0ab59994b2e24e85734cbe14200f31f3e4d4e4e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 02:40:48PM +0530, Abhishek Tiwari wrote:
[...]
> Corrected format of the commit message and performed rebase. Please
> review the attached patch
> From 0ab59994b2e24e85734cbe14200f31f3e4d4e4e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Abhishek Tiwari
> Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 11:48:5
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 3:20 AM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 03:00:05AM +0530, Abhishek Tiwari wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 12:43 AM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
>> > On Sun, Mar 05, 2017 at 06:27:49PM +0530, Abhishek Tiwari wrote:
>> >> On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 8:48 AM, Dmitry V.
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 03:00:05AM +0530, Abhishek Tiwari wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 12:43 AM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 05, 2017 at 06:27:49PM +0530, Abhishek Tiwari wrote:
> >> On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 8:48 AM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> >> > On Sun, Mar 05, 2017 at 01:54:33AM +0530
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 12:43 AM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 05, 2017 at 06:27:49PM +0530, Abhishek Tiwari wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 8:48 AM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
>> > On Sun, Mar 05, 2017 at 01:54:33AM +0530, Abhishek Tiwari wrote:
>> >> On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 5:41 PM, Abhishek
On Sun, Mar 05, 2017 at 06:27:49PM +0530, Abhishek Tiwari wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 8:48 AM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 05, 2017 at 01:54:33AM +0530, Abhishek Tiwari wrote:
> >> On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 5:41 PM, Abhishek Tiwari wrote:
> >> > Good evening everyone,
> >> > I am Abhish
.
On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 8:48 AM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Mar 05, 2017 at 01:54:33AM +0530, Abhishek Tiwari wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 5:41 PM, Abhishek Tiwari
>> wrote:
>> > Good evening everyone,
>> > I am Abhishek Tiwari pursuing M.Tech IIT Kharagpur. I am looking
>> >
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 05, 2017 at 01:54:33AM +0530, Abhishek Tiwari wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 5:41 PM, Abhishek Tiwari
> wrote:
> > Good evening everyone,
> > I am Abhishek Tiwari pursuing M.Tech IIT Kharagpur. I am looking
> > forward to contribute to strace Project Idea -> Netlink socket
> > pa
On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 5:41 PM, Abhishek Tiwari
wrote:
> Good evening everyone,
> I am Abhishek Tiwari pursuing M.Tech IIT Kharagpur. I am looking
> forward to contribute to strace Project Idea -> Netlink socket
> parsers.
>
> Thank you.
Hi,
I have made a change in INSTALL file (there the boots
Good evening everyone,
I am Abhishek Tiwari pursuing M.Tech IIT Kharagpur. I am looking
forward to contribute to strace Project Idea -> Netlink socket
parsers.
Thank you.
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of
Hi list,
First, I would like to thank you for having selected me for the GSOC.
My name is Fabien Siron. I am a french CS student living in Paris and I
really wanted to use the LSE (Security/System Epita laboratory) fellowship
opportunity to participate at the GSOC.
My subject is *Netlink socket p
Hello guys,
I went through the ideas list in the strace website and i am interested in
the
*"Structured output*" of strace. I am currently pursuing Masters in
Information Technology in National Institute of Technology Karnataka
(NITK), India. I am about to finish my first year.
I have a good exper
51 matches
Mail list logo
